Anasta  24.10 min 

https://youtu.be/-Ly4UtWcy4g?si=FrcQ6McxrMSjS0ic

Watch the latest Anasta podcast- 

Straight from the horses mouth,  " Parramatta - Ryles, never offered Jonah Pezet a long-term deal"   He says Parramatta only ever wanted Pezet for one year.

The conversation was always 1 yrar.

So all the talk about the club being used, and all the cuckold blogs,  you can just flush them.

He also says the kids Parramatta have coming through are the succession plan. 

 

 

 

 

31007429270?profile=RESIZE_710x

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • And if the kids never become what the coach thinks they will become?

    New 5 year plan. Wash, rinse, repeat FMD.

    •  

       And if we block there pathway forcing them to leave and they become stars elsewhere?  

  • Dont believe a word Anasta says but its done so hope he plays well while he is here, or Joash steps up and takes his place.

  • I call this bullshit and  if Ryles claims this he's just another bulshitter and not a straight shooter at all

  • We have him for a season enjoy the ride. If he kicks the winning field goal against the Storm first round we'll all say what a master stoke. 

  • We must really really have some talent in our next gen pathways. Looking forward to that, actually long term strategy plays a huge part here. If youngsters feel they will get a shot at first grade, then they are more likely to come to the Eels as 15 / 16 year olds when recruited.

    Over time that means we get first look at exceptional juniors. Long term a great strategy. Just hope they are ironing our the wrinkles when it comes to re signing them for first grade and not losing them like we seem to do hand over fist.

    Short term we have a bit of pain and we have to take a breath whilst we get our house in order, I guess.

    Im not sure how much we can trust every word Anasta has said. He has been very fluid with his comments, i've heard him state Parra wanted him longer, i've heard him state Parra only wanted him for one year. All I know is that we have a very good foil for Mitch this year and the oppurtunity that they will create for our backs is going to be good to watch. Whether our backs can capitalise as a complete unit remains to be seen. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"Right, so if someone said they did something illegal, then a few months later said loud and clear they didn't do it that means they are innocent?
Sorry Chief makes no sense what you are saying. You say do not jump to conclusions if we don't know the…"
1 minute ago
HKF replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"Staying in Melbourne next season was not an option after he elected to take up the option of getting out of his contract. "
5 minutes ago
MeelK replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"Chief, I think you mean you'd put more trust in the version that suits your narrative... "
8 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"Oh yeah it could have started with us reaching out wanting long term, Pezet saying he wanted to play 7, Brisbane coming in and wanting him but not til 2027. He either stayed at Melbourne for 2026 or played FG at Parramatta in 2026 and we felt there…"
10 minutes ago
More…