Anasta 24.10 min
https://youtu.be/-Ly4UtWcy4g?si=FrcQ6McxrMSjS0ic
Watch the latest Anasta podcast-
Straight from the horses mouth, " Parramatta - Ryles, never offered Jonah Pezet a long-term deal" He says Parramatta only ever wanted Pezet for one year.
The conversation was always 1 yrar.
So all the talk about the club being used, and all the cuckold blogs, you can just flush them.
He also says the kids Parramatta have coming through are the succession plan.
Replies
Staying in Melbourne next season was not an option after he elected to take up the option of getting out of his contract.
Well it was, don't trigger the option. To trigger the option he would have known the deal before doing that. He wasn't doing a Zac Lomax.
Hold on, in the recent podcast Anasta said we never offered him long term. So which Anasta do you believe, ?
Doesn't matter what Anasta i believe, he said it. That was an interview before he had even signed officially. You are trying to get a "Gotcha ya" claim and there is not one to be had here Chief. He said that. If it wasn't true why say it? Especially saying it was always intended as a long term deal.
It is not like someone in a journal article said Anasta said this or hinted at it and then he cleared the air saying no. Anasta said it loud and clear and Maitua's questioning was clear.
And Anasta said it loud and clear in yesterday's podcast aswell.
No.use jumping to conclusions if we don't know the real answer.
This blog is concerning the Kayo podcast. Where he wasn't promoted by his mates, and he wasn't drunk on his Bali trip. Id put more.trust ith.his latest more formal podcast
Chief, I think you mean you'd put more trust in the version that suits your narrative...
Others are putting more trust in the other version.
When i posted this blog I didn't see both versions. Im just saying both can't be correct, and how would anyone prove which one is.
So you're saying the second version is bs - prove it.
What im saying is in the second version nobody prompted him. And in the first version Matuia prompted him
Im not making judgement, because nobody will ever know. But if I was in the jury I'd be leaning towards the second version slightly, until more evidence turns up.
Right, so if someone said they did something illegal, then a few months later said loud and clear they didn't do it that means they are innocent?
Sorry Chief makes no sense what you are saying. You say do not jump to conclusions if we don't know the real answer yet seem adament in your post that you believe we never wanted Pezet long term? So are you jumping to a conclusion?
What's promoted by his mates got to do with it? You actually think Maitua pressured him into saying Parramatta wanted a long term deal? What does him giving into that pressure do for him and those in that situation? Nothing. Anasta seemed to have let it slip it seems.
Mate, im just asking you which one is correct? Your the one that said the second version is incorrect as Anasta is protecting the Eels
Prove it LB
Talataina and Pezet are 2 different players. Renzo is a run threat with a good short kicking game and slick hands. He's a physical runner but a 5/8. Pezet is a halfback. We have Lincoln Fletcher that we're looking at as the long term replacement. Although Ethan Sanders could be heading out of Canberra given they just signed Coby Black.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
of 4 Next