5204270079?profile=RESIZE_710xThe Eels don't have to play twice against any of the top three-ranked teams, with the Brisbane Broncos and Manly Sea Eagles the only sides that they play twice that featured in last year's finals series. They have also been allocated a return leg against western Sydney rivals the Wests Tigers, Bulldogs and Panthers.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

    • There’s been utter disruption so far - no crowd advantage 

      no one knows how these unknown influences will factor yet 

      • Good point

        There has been several major changes and they will benefit those smart enough h TY o take advantage of them

  • Sharks definatly have the easiest draw.

    Goldcoast and warriors are gona be easy wins this year sharks play both of them twice that's 8 easy competition points for the year. All they need is 6wins outside of warriors and titans games for the rest of the year and they made the 8 and considering they play dragons and cowboys twice both of which are easier teams to beat aswell seems like a given they'll make the 8.

  • There are no easy draws.

    We play as many games as any other team. No home crowds.

    As always, it comes down to who wants it more.

  • It does not matter how easy or hard the draw seems to be, it has no effect on who wins the comp, if it did why are the same few teams always winning?. The best teams win the comp not the team with the easiest draw. An easy draw might help you get to the finals but you will get found out once there if you aren't good enough. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Poupou Escobar replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"I suspect this might be what's going on Adam."
33 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Bluey, Randy, good points.
What’s encouraging is that the engagement in this blog shows the site still has life and people who care enough to reply. That suggests the community is not dying as some predicted, but evolving.
We have lost posters for…"
34 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Probably because Melbourne, schifcofske and the lawyer aren't going to voluntarily provide evidence (documents) which may incriminate them or their client if the nrl conduct their own investigation. Best to subpoena them as part of the court process…"
49 minutes ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion What player each NRL club would need to cough-up to snare Lomax
"I am curious to how this plays out and the end result. Do we get a player out of this?
Do Melbourne drop off and Lomax goes to Union?"
53 minutes ago
More…