The Parramatta Eels have today commenced legal proceedings against Zac Lomax. The purpose of the proceedings is to enforce the release agreed in November 2025.
We have endeavoured to resolve this by negotiations. This has included a formal independent mediation process with Zac Lomax and his legal team and representatives of the Melbourne Storm. However, no deal has been reached.
Zac’s legal team have informed us in writing that he does not agree that the terms of the release can be enforced against him. Regrettably, we have been left with no alternative, but to approach the NSW Supreme Court to resolve this issue.
In late July / early August, Zac requested a release from his playing contract with the Parramatta Eels to pursue opportunities outside the NRL. After a period of negotiation with Zac and his lawyers, the Parramatta Eels agreed to the terms of a release for Zac to pursue opportunities outside of the NRL. As part of the release granted on 16 November 2025, the Parramatta Eels included conditions to safeguard the Club.
One of those conditions was that Zac could not join another NRL Club before 31 October 2028 without our express written consent.
This protected the Parramatta Eels (and its Members and fans) from a football perspective heading into the 2026 season. It ensured the Club would not lose a representative player to another NRL club without receiving adequate compensation/benefit during the period of Zac’s original contract. Zac agreed to that condition after receiving legal advice.
Parramatta Eels Chairman Matthew Beach made the following comments:
“It is disappointing that we have reached this position, but we have an obligation to the Club’s stakeholders to protect the contractual rights of our Club and the expectation of our Members, players and supporters that contracts will be honoured.
“Back in November 2025, we granted Zac Lomax’s request for a release to pursue opportunities outside the NRL on the condition that he would not return to the NRL during the period of his original playing contract with our Club, without our written consent.”
”Zac had legal representation during the negotiations of his release. Zac accepted those conditions on the basis that he told us that his interests were focused on pursuing opportunities with rugby union, particularly R360. The release documentation was registered with the NRL. The NRL are aware of the conditions associated with the release.
“Our Club believes in the importance of observing contractual obligations. Contracts allow Clubs and players to operate with certainty and within a framework of rules. Contracts are the very stuff that any member of the community and companies have to honour in order to ensure that there is fair dealing. The same applies to the NRL, Clubs and players.
“Late last year, when we were approached by Melbourne Storm, we engaged with them in good faith however we have not been able to come to an agreement that would represent sufficient value for our Club, particularly in relation to our football program. The guiding position of our Club has been to ensure a fair exchange of value for our football program in circumstances where the Storm are attempting to obtain the benefit.”
“Zac and his agent still have an opportunity to work with us to explore options with the other 16 NRL clubs. Notwithstanding this action, we remain open to discussions with any Club who may be willing to offer the appropriate value for our football program.”
“Our coaching staff, players, Members and fans would not expect us to consent to the release based on what has been offered, and therefore we have no alternative but to pursue legal action to enforce the terms of the release and protect the rights of our Club.”
Arthur Moses SC has been retained by the Parramatta Eels to represent its interests in court,” added Beach.
Replies
Why? I honestly don't see what would be that valuable in hearing Fong invent some contrary view just to troll everyone else.
I was probably being more humourous than anything else. Hard to make that clearer in text form... haha
I was wondering what Fong would of had to say on this and was surprised he hadn't commented. I too am applauding the club for this stance, however I am too experienced as a Parra fan to think we come out of this on top. What happened with the Fong?
LB, where is that post from of the face palm? It's the other way around from any perspective!
Facebook on Melbourne's page.
Well done Parra about time they grew a set of balls now go stick to V'Landys and the NRL as well
Also good to see the decision makers getting some credit. They've also hired the right person in Ryles and the culture has impressed since the bush coach and Gutherson have left the building.
Good job
Tell you what chief start commending them when they win this battle.
They cannot and I reiterate they cannot afford lose this battle.
It carries on a narrative much like recruitment that they can't finish the job.
The club much like in the recent attempted recruitment failures was in a strong position like they are in now,they have the legal right on there side if they fail to close this slam dunk then there questions that have been asked about finishing the job will continue to linger.This is the kicker imo it's so crucial to finish the job.
Sends a bigger picture message to players PAs and other clubs that Parra does have some backbone Parra can finish something it started the ramifications of this action can start the ball rolling positively in other areas of the club.
Go get this win Parra officials indirectly this could be the catalyst of positive things to come.
Reckon that this is equally as much v nrl's stance as it is Lomax/his management and Storm tbh!
Watch out us this year us when it comes to penalty n being naughty gradings and suspensions here on ... expect a few Junior Paulo's 9 weeks type of penalties dished up. But on the good note I now feel we will being in finally to challenge a few :)
good on us for standing strong. If we lose as at least we tried.
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
of 14 Next