Pangai jnr

Apparently called Roosters to see if they had room under their sambrero, surprisingly they knocked him back.We could let a couple go surely, he'd be a great addition to our pack.Evans and Takas can go, or even sign for less to fit him in ala Roosters.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I can't believe the Roosters said no. That doesn't seem like them at all. I wonder who answered the phone at the Roosters that day lol. 

    • They're probably sacked by now. 

  • Him and Nathan Brown could job share, play 12 rounds each suspended 12 rounds each. 

    • Lol nice one hehe 

  • Depends on price and if BA could get him playing more consistently. Love Eels to get him at the right price.

  • According to Zerp Tackle TPJ is on $600K for three years

    Lane is on $450K with us for 4 years 

     

    • And who do you think is providing more value, even allowing for Lane's dip in form ?

  • Right now I'd rather Evans over TPJ. He's been going like a busted up here. He's deadset on the nose at the Broncos with his ill discipline. They're only picking him due to a lack of other options. Besides, he's an edge forward, he doesn't have the work rate that a middle needs.

    If the Broncos & the Roosters don't want him that tells you a lot.

    • Brett, I'm surprised he's still there - I heard ages ago that they wanted to move he and James Roberts on, managed to offload 1 out of 2.

      • They’ve been quietly trying to offload him for some time, but his contract is toxic. There’s no question of his talent, and I’m sure theres a coach out there who can get the best out of him, maybe Adam O’Brien could, but the problem is that he’s already 25 and plays like he’s only 21. He’s not a rookie anymore. I see him eventually going England where his natural skill will be a hit. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"I can't recall seeing a flag in recent times after the Brett incident. Now I know why, thanks Super.
Geez, Brett used it a a genius trolling weapon though...
 "
2 minutes ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"No. He was the only one who refused after I gave him 4 months to swap it. He said he wasn't changing and he'd cop the ban.
I've gone back 8 years and 1,000 members and Brett was the only one with an Israeli or Palestinian flag. He'd also been warned…"
17 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"Yes, Super & mods were probably naive at one point in allowing flag avatars. That was then.
Brett showed we need the Brett Rule.
He showed, even despite being gone, how powerful a trolling weapon a flag can be. A genius trolling strategy. It creates…"
22 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"I am not on the "Hook" You seem to be asking all the questions of late......Do you mind telling me why I am "on the Hook"
I have read your comments and you keep repeating the same questions, my guess is your posts are contributory to angst and offer…"
46 minutes ago
More…