Pangai jnr

Apparently called Roosters to see if they had room under their sambrero, surprisingly they knocked him back.We could let a couple go surely, he'd be a great addition to our pack.Evans and Takas can go, or even sign for less to fit him in ala Roosters.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I can't believe the Roosters said no. That doesn't seem like them at all. I wonder who answered the phone at the Roosters that day lol. 

    • They're probably sacked by now. 

  • Him and Nathan Brown could job share, play 12 rounds each suspended 12 rounds each. 

    • Lol nice one hehe 

  • Depends on price and if BA could get him playing more consistently. Love Eels to get him at the right price.

  • According to Zerp Tackle TPJ is on $600K for three years

    Lane is on $450K with us for 4 years 

     

    • And who do you think is providing more value, even allowing for Lane's dip in form ?

  • Right now I'd rather Evans over TPJ. He's been going like a busted up here. He's deadset on the nose at the Broncos with his ill discipline. They're only picking him due to a lack of other options. Besides, he's an edge forward, he doesn't have the work rate that a middle needs.

    If the Broncos & the Roosters don't want him that tells you a lot.

    • Brett, I'm surprised he's still there - I heard ages ago that they wanted to move he and James Roberts on, managed to offload 1 out of 2.

      • They’ve been quietly trying to offload him for some time, but his contract is toxic. There’s no question of his talent, and I’m sure theres a coach out there who can get the best out of him, maybe Adam O’Brien could, but the problem is that he’s already 25 and plays like he’s only 21. He’s not a rookie anymore. I see him eventually going England where his natural skill will be a hit. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"Bluey, Badger and Macey,
The NSW Supreme Court could uphold the restraint and still trim it. So we'd win in principle, but Lomax could be cleared to play earlier than 31 October 2028.
A pivot issue could be how the court see our 'alleged rejection'…"
11 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"I totally agree, but they were arrogant...they were sure we would buckle.
Not Today Satan"
1 hour ago
Blue Eel replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"Yep Badger, that sounds about right. If the Eels hold Zac's legal registered rights 2006-2008 to play NRL, then the Storm contract would be considered invalid as it goes against the strict conditions of the Eels release contract.
If the court was to…"
2 hours ago
KENDOZA replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"We do anyway"
3 hours ago
More…