For me I think Marata Niukore because he can fill 2 or 3 positions and you get more out of him in 80 minutes

2.Papalii because of workload.

3. Mahoney because of dummy half feeds however he does not run the ball enough

4.Ray Stone because of versatility and has some mongrel

5. Kafussi is promising but not big enough.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Yep Marata for me too.

    Reallu loved his impact off the bench and his versatility...

    Definitely worth keeping

    • I'm with you Frank, I think if Parra wanted to keep Reed we would have found the money, I believe there are questions over his shoulder. 
      Marata will be a star of the future and the one I'd keep.

    • at 625 ?

  • Reed Mahoney

    • Yes Reed . I can live with any disappointment regards Parra since their prominent years of grand finals 1976 - 1986   having watched all ( on TV ) . So while  news of Reed leaving was at first a shock and I can live with that , I would prefer him out there in the middle playing for the Eels for next 5 years at least . Oh well I don't really care as much as it sounds as I have a good feeling that Parra will overcome that setback. 

  • Mahoney. I think that's pretty obvious. Al the others are explainable, losing Mahoney was inexcusable. 

    • SACK REED NOW!!

      • Absolutely. He's fully committed to winning a premiership with the Eels in 2022 apparently. Clearly he's very committed 🤦🏼‍♂️

  • none, all paid overs 

  • Reed, mainly do to his positon in the spine and his youth.

    I think I'll miss the others more, but I would've kept Mahoney

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Clintorian replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Not to mention all the other teams in Rugby he could be playing in."
22 minutes ago
Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"It's now out of the NRL's hands. If the court says the conditions of the release are valid and still stand then that is that. The NRL can't stomp all over the Eels' legal rights.  Lomax told the Eels in writing he was proceeding with the Storm…"
2 hours ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"You'd think it's in the NRL's best interest to be on Parra's side here. If they take the side of Lomax then every player contract means nothing. This is bigger than a single case- it could open up a world where players do whatever they want,…"
2 hours ago
Eelovution replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"When the announcement was made by the Eels regarding the dispute with Lomax, the club made a very important note in their commentary- the agreement was made in 'Good Faith'. This is a very important principle in legal agreements- both parties agree…"
4 hours ago
More…