For me I think Marata Niukore because he can fill 2 or 3 positions and you get more out of him in 80 minutes

2.Papalii because of workload.

3. Mahoney because of dummy half feeds however he does not run the ball enough

4.Ray Stone because of versatility and has some mongrel

5. Kafussi is promising but not big enough.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Yep Marata for me too.

    Reallu loved his impact off the bench and his versatility...

    Definitely worth keeping

    • I'm with you Frank, I think if Parra wanted to keep Reed we would have found the money, I believe there are questions over his shoulder. 
      Marata will be a star of the future and the one I'd keep.

    • at 625 ?

  • Reed Mahoney

    • Yes Reed . I can live with any disappointment regards Parra since their prominent years of grand finals 1976 - 1986   having watched all ( on TV ) . So while  news of Reed leaving was at first a shock and I can live with that , I would prefer him out there in the middle playing for the Eels for next 5 years at least . Oh well I don't really care as much as it sounds as I have a good feeling that Parra will overcome that setback. 

  • Mahoney. I think that's pretty obvious. Al the others are explainable, losing Mahoney was inexcusable. 

    • SACK REED NOW!!

      • Absolutely. He's fully committed to winning a premiership with the Eels in 2022 apparently. Clearly he's very committed 🤦🏼‍♂️

  • none, all paid overs 

  • Reed, mainly do to his positon in the spine and his youth.

    I think I'll miss the others more, but I would've kept Mahoney

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"Love this, pretty much saying F you to Lomax, Melbourne and the NRL. I will say, let's say Melbourne were dealing with Roosters or Dogs. Would they of tried this shit, bitching to the NRL, taking on Gould or Politis? They thought we would be bullied…"
2 minutes ago
Joel H replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"Lomax isn't part of or paying the Union at the moment. So no representation. (No active player contract)"
2 minutes ago
Michael W. replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"Could be a house for sale down the south coast shortly."
21 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"Wow ! has a full hearing in the Supreme Court ever happened just one day after petition. I'm blown away by that. "
22 minutes ago
More…