Orford

Orford stalked by Eels and Raiders, while Cooper and Cronk stay put
Brad Walter
September 10, 2010

PARRAMATTA have targeted Matt Orford to play halfback while they wait for Quade Cooper or Cooper Cronk to become available - but the Eels face stiff competition from Canberra for the services of the former Manly captain.

Orford, 32, who has been playing in England, is understood to have met last week with Parramatta chief executive Paul Osborne and coach Daniel Anderson. Anderson said the Eels lacked a top-line playmaker after they bowed out of play-off contention. Eels officials made a strong bid to lure Cooper from rugby union after attempts to persuade Cronk to move north after the Storm salary-cap scandal failed, but they have again fallen short.

Cooper, the player considered most likely to help the Wallabies to World Cup success next year, is expected to announce today that he is staying in rugby union for a further two years. It is understood the opportunity of playing in a World Cup convinced Cooper to stay, and his decision was helped by the fact the Australian Rugby Union significantly increased their offer after initially being stunned by the deal tabled by Parramatta.

Cooper, who receives a total of $260,000 a year from the Queensland Reds and the ARU, is believed to be guaranteed about $600,000 under the new deal, as well as match payments for Tests and Super 15.

The deal is still short of the $3.2 million, four-year offer the Eels are believed to have been prepared to make, but if Cooper stars at the World Cup he might be even more valuable when his new two-year contract with the ARU expires in 2013.

The 22-year-old New Zealand-born five-eighth has indicated several times that he eventually wants to try his hand at league after growing up playing both codes and the Eels are likely to still be interested when he comes off contract again.

Cronk is also off contract at the Storm in 2013 and Parramatta officials are again likely to make a bid for the Melbourne halfback.

Meanwhile, the Eels believe Orford could fill the void and Osborne and Anderson met with him last week.

However, the Raiders are also keen and have been in talks with the former Manly premiership winner since learning he wanted to return from England if he can get a two-year deal in the NRL.

Orford is understood to have recently visited Canberra and toured the Raiders facilities at Bruce, where the Australian Institute of Sport is.

Sources in England say Orford was impressed by the set-up, and there is speculation he has agreed to a deal with the Raiders. But Orford remains under contract to Bradford, and the Bulls are reluctant to release him unless an NRL club is prepared to pay a transfer fee similar to the £100,000 ($166,000) they got from South Sydney for Sam Burgess.

Leeds are also seeking a £100,000 release fee for Kiwis international Greg Eastwood, who wants to return to the NRL and has been linked with Canterbury. Eastwood is good friends with Penrith second-rower turned Bulldog Frank Pritchard.

 

 

From the Sydney Morning Herald

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Nothing we didn't already know.

    Personally I'd rather give Murrary/Humble a crack next season than for us to spend 300k on Orford who will probably be looking for a 2 year deal anyways thus inhibiting our ability to sign someone of quality for 2012.

    Same as Anasta for mine, no doubt better than what we had this year yet still not in the elite category which we strive for
  • yeah you probally right. murray humble could be very exciting. cronk for 2013 he would be getting on. as is orford. and quade looks happy in union
  • Agree there. We have brought new juniors and have very talented juniors as well. Trial and error with them and get the team to work around humble and Murray
  • thats if ando see's it that way of course which i bet he dont,
  • Murraly/Humble is the option that I would go for as well.
  • Anyone who is willing to settle for a Murray/Humble halves combo is basically saying that they dont mind not winning a comp in the next 2 years.There is no way that another rookie halves combo will win us a comp.Havnt you guys learnt anything from the Eels reliance on the "next big thing"?if we went with those guys next year and were 0 and 5 to start the season you would all be willing to string Ando and Ozzy up in the Cronin stand.We need an experienced,ballplaying number 7 or we are going to again be very poor next year.
  • I'm with ya Clive 100%
  • I am a bit confused with the years stated in this article, I thought we were after Quade for next year 2011 but this article says that he would be more valuable after his new 2 year contract expires in 2013 which is 3 years away so is he on contract already till 2011, if so how can he come to us next year? It also states that Cronk is off contract in 2013 which to me means he won't be going to a new club until 2014 season once again 3 years away so we have to fill the void for 3 seasons if we want one of these two players. Am I blond or do I have that right.
  • Spot on Clive...We need an experienced playmaker that can nurture the younger players...Show them the ropes and help develop them. Morts has suffered from being thrown into the ring too early and fingers crossed he comes good next year. In any event from the tone of the article it seems he is impressed with the raiders and they seem to be in the front running - Who blames him considering how young and dynamic the raiders team seems accross the park.
  • you have it mostly right. It says that cooper is likely to resign for union rather than come to us for 2010.
    It just saying they will look to get him in 2012 for 2013.
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Big Kev the Eel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R19 v Penriff: Junz' 200th; Spine reshuffles, Cleary, Yeo, Simmo, Little Pap in
"Sack Ryles. 
What another load of garbage dished up today.
Clueless "
1 minute ago
Cumberland Eel replied to Mick aka Supreme Leader's discussion Grant Atkins should be sacked IMO
"If he is an honorary member of the Panthers then he should not be allowed to referee a Penrith game period. That's a blatant conflict of interest and borderline criminal. Besides that the Eels were utterly disgusting today. Totally like an under…"
3 minutes ago
KENDOZA replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R19 v Penriff: Junz' 200th; Spine reshuffles, Cleary, Yeo, Simmo, Little Pap in
"This club is going backwards. The improvement was there weeks ago but the last two losses are unacceptable. We need signings it's as simple as that. The same players keep fucking up they will never learn"
5 minutes ago
Collaroy Eel replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion Haven’t commented here for a while. Good to see we’re still a dumb team.,
"Same adjective I chose when describing Parra. Just fucking DUMB!
Drop balls (which were sitters), forced passes which land in the opposition hands. Lomax not catching easy passes when all he needed to do was just catch the ball to score.
Made…"
6 minutes ago
More…