The NRL is preparing to step in to resolve the Melbourne-Parramatta contract stand-off over Zac Lomax.
Lomax is eager to join the Storm after his proposed move to rebel rugby competition R360 was delayed when its start date was pushed back to 2028.
Lomax is in limbo after the Eels agreed to release him from the final three years of his contract. One of the terms of Lomax’s release was that he cannot play for a rival NRL club without their permission during that period.
The Eels have no interest in any transfer fees and are only prepared to entertain a player swap, with Storm stars Jack Howarth, Xavier Coates and Stefano Utoikamanu at the top of their wish list.
Melbourne have lost a number of players from last year’s losing grand final squad. Ryan Papenhuyzen and Nelson Asofa-Solomona were granted early releases, while Eli Katoa will also miss the entire 2026 campaign after emergency surgery following a series of head knocks while playing a Test for Tonga. The Storm cannot afford to lose any more representative players and have knocked back the Eels’ approach.
Sources with knowledge of the situation not authorised to speak publicly confirmed the Storm had offered Parramatta about $200,000 in compensation.
The transfer fee was considered reasonable, according to the same sources, especially given Canterbury paid Wests Tigers $165,000 in compensation for the mid-season arrival of promising playmaker Lachie Galvin last year.
Any financial compensation will not assist the Eels in the open market. Transfer fees assist clubs with football operations, including pathways, but are not factored into the salary cap.
Sources confirmed the NRL is prepared to intervene if the Eels are not prepared to budge and entertain any “reasonable offers” by the Storm, or any rival club in the market for the 26-year-old.
Lomax is a NSW Origin representative, was a part of the initial Kangaroos Ashes squad and the NRL does not want to lose a player of his calibre if it is possible to keep him.
Neither the Eels nor Lomax want a reunion. Since losing Lomax, Parramatta have signed Brian Kelly from the Gold Coast.
The NRL was contacted for comment, while the Eels and Storm said there had been no fresh developments on Monday. Lomax’s lawyer, Ramy Qutami, also declined to comment.
Some rival clubs made it clear during a phone hook-up of CEOs last Wednesday that they wanted the NRL to back Parramatta’s hardline stance on Lomax. During that meeting Storm chief executive Justin Rodski was forced to defend the club’s pursuit of the star outside back.
Lomax, who posted a photo of himself at what appeared to be a Melbourne Renegades Big Bash game over the weekend, has been trying to remain in tip-top physical shape while awaiting an outcome.
Any deal put forward by the Storm will be longer than one season. Lomax’s ability to play several positions in the back line has appeal, and he adds depth to a squad that includes winger Will Warbrick (who struggled with concussion symptoms for most of last season) and young No.1 Sua Faalogo (who is likely to need a physical and mental rest at some stage during the campaign).
Lomax’s management confirmed on a podcast late last week that ARL Commission chairman Peter V’landys was happy to welcome Lomax back to the NRL, and the threat of 10-year bans did not apply because the NSW Origin representative never signed a deal with R360.
Super Rugby clubs the Western Force and ACT Brumbies were keen to sign Lomax, only for the outside back to have a change of heart after Christmas.
Eels CEO Jim Sarantinos said last week: “As far as we’re concerned, we won’t be consenting to him signing with another club unless there’s an appropriate exchange of value.
“We have had a representative player leave our roster who now wants to join another club’s roster.”
Replies
NRL wants to negotiate a deal now. Ok Melbourne can have Lomax but we want to sign Joseph Manu for 1.2million with 700k cap exemption
Now we're talkin'!
Problem is Manu is basically signed and sealed to the roosters he wouldn't come to us.If we are being really unrealistic let's give them Lomax this year for the rights to Munster 27 onwards.
Now there's a deal we lose Pezet in 27 so it works out perfect talent and timing wise for us and we end up either the best halves combo in the comp.
Maybe the NRL will be as good as the US has been in brokering a deal between UKR & RUS.
Hold firm Jim! Take em nowhere, give em nothing and then bring em home early.
Don't be suprised if the nrl hits us with a fine for not tsking the 200k 🤣🤣🤣
I'd like to know how they calculated the 200k figure. Seems very random and not built on anything factual.
Are the NRL really saying they will intervene?
Seems to me that once Lomax's other manager took over from Schifcofske, the narrative changed to "poor Lomax, Melbourne are ok, best for the game to let him back in, no harm done, Parra will be reasonable".
This is all being led by Lomax's management with Melbourne backgrounding. Not sure the NRL are doing anything yet. And not sure they really can. Of course they want this to be resolved, but taking sides and screwing over one NRL club at the expense of another will be terrible PR for them (even if they could make the small issue of a legal contract go away).
Geez I'd love to see what you would all be saying if Parra was the one trying to sign Suaalii and the chooks had a clause.
We currently have nothing. We could get something. It's not harder than that. Stefano would be amazing, Blore + an outside back would be great and Tui + an outside back is acceptable.
You are all choosing to let your own egos overwhelm your strategic decision making. No one wants Lomax except for Melbourne. We can get NOTHING or we can get players who fill positions of need for us. If you cannot comprehend that than maybe you should do some reflection and study and not make comments on a situation that's too big for you.
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
of 7 Next