NRL Charges

What does it take to be sent off. A classic from last nights game is the tackle on Lane verses Sivo. Sivo a fine and the 2 Manly players get 2 weeks each. How does Parramatta benefit from this? The teams advantaged are the teams Manly play over the next week and the team disadvantaged is Parramatta. Cleary Sivo was dumb but should not have been binned. Also Penisini should not have been binned because Turbo was in front of the kicker. Brown was also called not square when clearly he was square. Manly players where also driving with the head in tackles and getting away with it. Another classic of why a fullback should not be sin binned. How Cherry Evans was not binned for back chat shows me why the captain should be a front line player.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Dylbags was dumb for playing at the hookers arm, this is always called a penalty, Hayne used to do it all the time and it was a penalty every time. 

    For the record Hayne was square when he did it and so was Dylbags on the weekend. 

    • Yep he was square. The refs eyes could not keep up with the play. I refuse to believe he was cheating. It's too simple to say that. I think they just aren't mentally capable of keeping up with the speed of the game. It's beyond them. It's beyond anyone. Even our "expert" commentators need replays all the time before they comment and they literally watch footy for a living. In such a scenario a bad ref will ref in a direction. It's suttle and hard to pick but it's there. I see it in many games.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Clintorian, I'd be flabbergasted if this isn't casually swept under the rug.
Regardless of outcomes, it makes me smile we are playing a different game —pulling the rug away with the power of the subpoena.
Legal muscle and daylight. If you can't beat…"
11 minutes ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Im thinking some of the savvy, experienced and high performing operators around the game will see this as an opportunity to pull a double whammy on their rival. Think about the possibility presenting itself to Penrith, Roosters, Sharks, Bulldogs and…"
24 minutes ago
Longfin Eel replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"This is pretty funny really. The fact that Melbourne just assumed this would be OK suggests they have done similar things before and not been pinged for it by the salary cap auditors. No doubt the NRL sweeps under the carpet issues that are found…"
28 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Wow... HOE, this is what I was looking for as I wasn't sure how Storm could be forced to pay for his legal bills.
THIS IS HUGE!
 "
33 minutes ago
More…