Well he told me before hand about the Poore and Shack signings (before I was on here), so he's got a good track record in regards to being in the know, but I guess with QC, with all the conflicting reports were seeing out there, it's hard to know what to believe really.
Overall, though, I'd rate the source as relatively reliable.
""Tad, what is a primary source? especially from the ABC"
context is elevant because I wasn't looking to educate myself in this instance, I am pretty well versed to make my judgement of Blaize and my post was not derogatory towards him, it was…"
"The Dogs gained success this year after 3 years of coaching by Ciraldo that was an "in the trenches, knock em down, in your face" style of football. Then Ciraldo has Galvin presented to him and that is the antithesis of his game. So to acommodate…"
"Good old karma, it can be a real bitch. I don't mind watching Gould's world crash and burn. Galvin will develop into a good player, but at the moment he's like a spanner in the works."
"Poppa you basically discredited Neil Camptons article on Blaize because it came from an ABC source with out even reading it.. A 5 year old would probably absorb any information as part of his growing process. When we become adults? we probably have…"
Replies
I guess we will soon find out.
Still don't know what to make of the info I was given not that long ago about QC and whether he was coming or not.
Overall, though, I'd rate the source as relatively reliable.