Replies

  • Mitch has come of age and owns the team now. He's also starting to own the opposition which is a sign of a great half on the brew.

    He must take us to the Promised land though in the next 3 years. We are only a couple forwards short of being proper premiership contenders.

    Every half may have a great season but he will need to back it year in-year out  if he wants the NSW and Australia No. 7 which would probably be thrown at him if there was a rep game now. He is the comp's form half.

    With the new stadium, centre of excellence coming up and a decent team, Parra's big dick has started swinging.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Should we keep Kelma?
"Issue is, he is playing well lately, but also playing for a contract. If you can have him on a 1 year deal, sure why not. But on a long term deal could be a risk."
33 seconds ago
JC replied to Kurupt - Your Mums Favourite Thug's discussion DISGRACEFUL REFEREEING AGAIN!!!
"The touchy called that one."
14 minutes ago
Angry Eel replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Should we keep Kelma?
"Totally get where you're coming from. I can't help but think how good he can be when he wants to. "
14 minutes ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Should we keep Kelma?
"I understand where your coming from Angry but I still think we'd be better off using that roster spot for someone who will take that opportunity and prove they belong. He has a poor commitment level and professionalism."
18 minutes ago
More…