In the Sun Herald yesterday it was revealed that the NRL has accepted Canterbuy`s explanations regarding the two player 'taking a dive' in the match against Eastern Suburbs. So no action will be taken against Ennis or Perrit both of whom were accused of 'taking a dive'. It is rather odd that it has taken so long to reach a decision on this matter. The match was several weeks ago. It is a fact that if you take excessive time in these matters most people forget the incident and our now unconcerned about the outcome. Did the NRL direct the review people to take excessive time in this matter? It seems that this is another example of Canterbury being indulged in recent cases that other clubs don`t get. Keep your eye on how these things favour
Canterbury. I am.
Replies
Can the NRL actually penalise players for taking a dive? Diving is relatively new to the NRL and only began when they stuffed around with the obstruction rule. Its a problem the NRL have created and they have to fix it asap.
Yes, good point FME. They could be accused of holding up play which is the point of taking a dive. But brissyeel is right also I feel. If they have taken a dive off they should go for concussion test. Canterbury of course are taking advantage of the new situation . They appear to have a Godfather looking after them!
Agreed but only if contact was made with the head. How about the Luke Brooks dive against us. He got brushed up against his shoulder and went down like he had been shot. What can they do about that? They can't get him off to check for concusion if he didnt get hit in the head. Based on the descisions the refs have been making this year, and years past, I think they should be checked for concusion before, during and after the game.