Money money money

Hi all, this is not exactly an eels blog but I was wondering about player payments. Lately we have seena crackdown on illegal play. Some players get fined and more serious illegal play gets them suspended. The play who gets fined obviously cops a personal monatary hit ( note the pun). But for the player who is suspended does he also lose money while suspended or is he still paid the same money while suspended. If his pay is reduced while suspended then he is penalised twice. Also, do injured players (some out for months) take a pay cut while not playing. 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Don’t have an answer to your question however since on the subject of fines, I would rather see the fine a percentage of a players salary rather than the fine being a fixed amount. Munster copped a $1150 fine. Probably no big deal for a player on his salary however a big hit for a player on the minimum. 

    • The kick was more than a fine. No penalty or suspension for a undeniable dog act. How many games did he get suspended the last time he kicked someone, sinbin I recall but nothing last night. That bullshit excuse he gave was worth a fine.

      Nothing mentioned about late contact to the head on the To'o try. Holmes could have avoided it but instead cut his eyebrow. DB got 3 weeks pre crack down.

      J Arrows leg twist on Cleary after his kick also dog act. Cleary gets hit alot post kick but this one he reacted to. Why? Dog act.

    • That's like fining drivers a percentage of their wage for running a red light .  Why should I pay more than some deadshit for the same infringement just because I work harder ? 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Coryn Hughes replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"I've heard this before apparently Keon Kolomatangi was a done deal that was mail from a poster on here."
50 seconds ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"No Parra must not wither at the vine here they must persist even if it costs them thousands in court.The NRL and PVL better bein Parra's corner also if this is let to slide forget about honouring contracts they mean absolutely nothing.
Big talk PVL…"
1 minute ago
Angry Eel replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"Lomax doesn't have a legal leg to stand on. No risk whatsoever "
9 minutes ago
The Badger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"At this moment in time I can't see the point in money only, as we can't seem to sign anyone worth said $$.
But if that's the deal $650K X 3 = $1.95M. 
Call it $2M straight up or no deal."
16 minutes ago
More…