Money money money

Hi all, this is not exactly an eels blog but I was wondering about player payments. Lately we have seena crackdown on illegal play. Some players get fined and more serious illegal play gets them suspended. The play who gets fined obviously cops a personal monatary hit ( note the pun). But for the player who is suspended does he also lose money while suspended or is he still paid the same money while suspended. If his pay is reduced while suspended then he is penalised twice. Also, do injured players (some out for months) take a pay cut while not playing. 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Don’t have an answer to your question however since on the subject of fines, I would rather see the fine a percentage of a players salary rather than the fine being a fixed amount. Munster copped a $1150 fine. Probably no big deal for a player on his salary however a big hit for a player on the minimum. 

    • The kick was more than a fine. No penalty or suspension for a undeniable dog act. How many games did he get suspended the last time he kicked someone, sinbin I recall but nothing last night. That bullshit excuse he gave was worth a fine.

      Nothing mentioned about late contact to the head on the To'o try. Holmes could have avoided it but instead cut his eyebrow. DB got 3 weeks pre crack down.

      J Arrows leg twist on Cleary after his kick also dog act. Cleary gets hit alot post kick but this one he reacted to. Why? Dog act.

    • That's like fining drivers a percentage of their wage for running a red light .  Why should I pay more than some deadshit for the same infringement just because I work harder ? 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

The Captain replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"It definitely opens the doors for more counter attack for teams who have that attacking prowess. It'll be interesting to see who uses it to their advantage, I could see the Broncos or the Dolphins using this well.
Balanced teams probably don't get…"
21 minutes ago
Frank The Tank replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"The NRL are fast becoming the ALP of sport.
Introducing laws (rule changes) for the sake of it. The reason they change so often is because the stuffed it up in the first instance. Fuck.....leave the game as it was please, it's not broken."
55 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"1 i really like,  - Teams can sometimes keep the ball for 15 minutes and kill the opposition with fatigue  In the NFL scoring teams have always kicked off, it makes more sense 
 
2. I like.  I think it will suit Parramatta having more depth than…"
1 hour ago
MeelK replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"Captain this is an interesting one. Will teams forced to kick off after scoring start to kick short more often? From memory the short drop outs are close to 50/50 now."
1 hour ago
More…