Money money money

Hi all, this is not exactly an eels blog but I was wondering about player payments. Lately we have seena crackdown on illegal play. Some players get fined and more serious illegal play gets them suspended. The play who gets fined obviously cops a personal monatary hit ( note the pun). But for the player who is suspended does he also lose money while suspended or is he still paid the same money while suspended. If his pay is reduced while suspended then he is penalised twice. Also, do injured players (some out for months) take a pay cut while not playing. 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Don’t have an answer to your question however since on the subject of fines, I would rather see the fine a percentage of a players salary rather than the fine being a fixed amount. Munster copped a $1150 fine. Probably no big deal for a player on his salary however a big hit for a player on the minimum. 

    • The kick was more than a fine. No penalty or suspension for a undeniable dog act. How many games did he get suspended the last time he kicked someone, sinbin I recall but nothing last night. That bullshit excuse he gave was worth a fine.

      Nothing mentioned about late contact to the head on the To'o try. Holmes could have avoided it but instead cut his eyebrow. DB got 3 weeks pre crack down.

      J Arrows leg twist on Cleary after his kick also dog act. Cleary gets hit alot post kick but this one he reacted to. Why? Dog act.

    • That's like fining drivers a percentage of their wage for running a red light .  Why should I pay more than some deadshit for the same infringement just because I work harder ? 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Poppa replied to Poppa's discussion Poppa' Corner: The Footie Gods were kind against Dragons and Broncs, this one not so!!......Depth! What Depth is Left?
"Thanks Cappy, its reassuring to see you see it like me.....yesterday's game will prove pivotal in a year that confirms my view THAT this game was so important to win.
i.e. if we don't beat Tigers this round ......we are in deep shit....matter of…"
52 seconds ago
Muttman replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion NRL issue warning to Moses
"I would have lost it after the Williams incident. You can guarantee if Williams dives over at that point and plants the ball for a try he would have been told to play the ball. FFS Gough penalised Russell for a head clash which knocked him out. It…"
1 minute ago
The Captain replied to Muttman's discussion Sack Mark O’Neill.
"Apparently MON was a conduit for BA too - that was the excuse back then also. So if MON is just a conduit, he's redundant and his role isn't required because he's not adding any value.
So he's either a conduit and redundant or he's accoutable and…"
1 minute ago
Hell On Eels replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion NRL issue warning to Moses
"Carls, A meeting is likely to happen, but it also probably happened after round 1. And the bollocks has come back.
V'landys would have had something to do with Gough's diabolical performance yesterday. Same with Todd Smith's round 1. Gough should be…"
13 minutes ago
More…