Money money money

Hi all, this is not exactly an eels blog but I was wondering about player payments. Lately we have seena crackdown on illegal play. Some players get fined and more serious illegal play gets them suspended. The play who gets fined obviously cops a personal monatary hit ( note the pun). But for the player who is suspended does he also lose money while suspended or is he still paid the same money while suspended. If his pay is reduced while suspended then he is penalised twice. Also, do injured players (some out for months) take a pay cut while not playing. 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Don’t have an answer to your question however since on the subject of fines, I would rather see the fine a percentage of a players salary rather than the fine being a fixed amount. Munster copped a $1150 fine. Probably no big deal for a player on his salary however a big hit for a player on the minimum. 

    • The kick was more than a fine. No penalty or suspension for a undeniable dog act. How many games did he get suspended the last time he kicked someone, sinbin I recall but nothing last night. That bullshit excuse he gave was worth a fine.

      Nothing mentioned about late contact to the head on the To'o try. Holmes could have avoided it but instead cut his eyebrow. DB got 3 weeks pre crack down.

      J Arrows leg twist on Cleary after his kick also dog act. Cleary gets hit alot post kick but this one he reacted to. Why? Dog act.

    • That's like fining drivers a percentage of their wage for running a red light .  Why should I pay more than some deadshit for the same infringement just because I work harder ? 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

christeel replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"Bahaha  !!!   poppy  since the  Bradman  era it's you  that's  been living  in denial  .... i see 3 pair's  of white  socks."
50 minutes ago
LB replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"No you don't understand what i am saying. We could want to extend, but they might not want to. Reason being they want to test the market, with two new teams on in the market that is why their management say "hold back" on signing extensions. Why…"
51 minutes ago
ParraPride replied to Roy tannous's discussion Jake Clifford?
"CHT or Metcalf would be perfect next to Moses."
1 hour ago
Darren Munro replied to Roy tannous's discussion Jake Clifford?
"How much is pezet on? If Lorenzo is a flop we could be in a bit of trouble..I  would like a utility back that can cover multiple positions like Averillo.  Maybe they are grooming bamblett for this type of role. "
1 hour ago
More…