Money money money

Hi all, this is not exactly an eels blog but I was wondering about player payments. Lately we have seena crackdown on illegal play. Some players get fined and more serious illegal play gets them suspended. The play who gets fined obviously cops a personal monatary hit ( note the pun). But for the player who is suspended does he also lose money while suspended or is he still paid the same money while suspended. If his pay is reduced while suspended then he is penalised twice. Also, do injured players (some out for months) take a pay cut while not playing. 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Don’t have an answer to your question however since on the subject of fines, I would rather see the fine a percentage of a players salary rather than the fine being a fixed amount. Munster copped a $1150 fine. Probably no big deal for a player on his salary however a big hit for a player on the minimum. 

    • The kick was more than a fine. No penalty or suspension for a undeniable dog act. How many games did he get suspended the last time he kicked someone, sinbin I recall but nothing last night. That bullshit excuse he gave was worth a fine.

      Nothing mentioned about late contact to the head on the To'o try. Holmes could have avoided it but instead cut his eyebrow. DB got 3 weeks pre crack down.

      J Arrows leg twist on Cleary after his kick also dog act. Cleary gets hit alot post kick but this one he reacted to. Why? Dog act.

    • That's like fining drivers a percentage of their wage for running a red light .  Why should I pay more than some deadshit for the same infringement just because I work harder ? 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"Captain, agents are a problem in the game as you suggest. And Lomax is only 26. Yet, the timeline suggests more responsibility might rest with Lomax than at first it seems.
The pattern points to Lomax positioning for R360 rather than a single forced…"
2 minutes ago
Eelovution replied to Mannah-Brow's discussion Knights Chasing Moretti
"Give them Matterson"
9 minutes ago
Poppa replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"You maybe right Randolph but every generation eventually comes back to some reality eventually.
These kids cannot be all Doctors, Engineers and Computer Wiz's.....it seem to me there are going to be a lot of Barista's (Coffee not legal) around on…"
15 minutes ago
Poppa replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"Let's assume he pays 6% on his mortgage, which would be something less than $4m, he may have had a property to sell before buying that one, i.e. higher equity , lets have a bigger guess and say 3m mortgage, 180k interest only is peanuts, he knocked…"
36 minutes ago
More…