Replies

  • Norman
  • Jennings is on $6-700k a year no one is giving him an upgrade. He wouldn’t even get $400k on the open market.

    Norman would be the man
  • m jennings he wants more money, and has a out in hes contract which ends with parra in 2019, he manager has been looking at other clubs with parra agreeing to let him go.

    the other player is cory norman he has had talks with wayne bennent in brisbane early this year , he wants to go back to the bronco's, i am sure brad arthur, would love to let him go, hes a party boy on too much money, both these players are playing poor.

    rochie,  from foxsports said last week he thinks cory norman and m jenning should be moved on at parra and replace by two younger player s who have a go.....these two wont be at parra next year no doubt..

  • If it is michael jennings and norman then this would be one the first steps forward arthur has taken in a long time.

    It would show that he at least has some degree of competence by recognising the structural problems in the top 30

    Next step would be to not offer contracts to at least 12 of the players at the club whose contracts expire at the end of the year.

    2019 and onwards
  • why would u get rid of Jennings unless u intend to sign a young gun centre. Never misses a tackle and still playing well. Have to be Norman

    • There's nothing wrong with Dane Akafolou running around at Wenty for the centre position, along with another young centre Tuimavave Afualo who is in the Jersey Flegg team this year and will be ISP next, if Dane goes up to NRL then Tui could readily go to ISP in his place.

      They are players we have for the future.

      • Yes there is, he cant tackle 

  • Norman

  • Anybody remember my blog asking would corey be here next year?

    Its very unlikely he'll be here next year ive heard

    • I thought it was a subtle way of letting us know without saying too mich

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Clintorian, I'd be flabbergasted if this isn't casually swept under the rug.
Regardless of outcomes, it makes me smile we are playing a different game —pulling the rug away with the power of the subpoena.
Legal muscle and daylight. If you can't beat…"
33 minutes ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Im thinking some of the savvy, experienced and high performing operators around the game will see this as an opportunity to pull a double whammy on their rival. Think about the possibility presenting itself to Penrith, Roosters, Sharks, Bulldogs and…"
47 minutes ago
Longfin Eel replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"This is pretty funny really. The fact that Melbourne just assumed this would be OK suggests they have done similar things before and not been pinged for it by the salary cap auditors. No doubt the NRL sweeps under the carpet issues that are found…"
51 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Wow... HOE, this is what I was looking for as I wasn't sure how Storm could be forced to pay for his legal bills.
THIS IS HUGE!
 "
56 minutes ago
More…