So what do you all think? Are we going to start on -4 points or not? Yes or no answer is fine. If you wish to elaborate then go ahead. I don't know enough about it to give an answer.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Arguing for costs is common in the Supreme Court. The losing side commonly cover some of the costs of the winner. The Judge usually decides that before proceedings close. Yes it may have been negotiated, that's also possible. But from my…"
"plus lomaxs costs lol"
"Joash is that guy if anything the guys we have playing centre and wings are interchangeable if needs be and if Iongi goes down Joash slots right in."
"Love how Petrus has been elevated to starting in Flegg. Bloke will be in Cup before you know it."
Replies
Bring on 2017 I say
Who cares, whats done is done and we cant change it now.
So if we do, we'll just have to win more games. If not then this whole discussions been a waste of time.
I think alot of people care TBUR. The comp is that close we can't afford this deduction. Just gauging peoples thoughts, that is all. :)
I agree completely. If he is to lead the club well then now is the time!
I actually think the current saga is more likely to cost us another player because as I mentioned before the 4 points is specific to abiding by the governance review.
Unless the NRL can prove we very deliberately lied to them, then I think what they may do is bring that money that needs to be added to the cap into this year's cap and that would force us to release another player. You'd think that would make it last year's money and this year's money and then if there is a breach penalty as well. If it was a 50k TPA it might mean we need to shed 150k, if it was 100k, it could be as much as 300k.
In fact, I guess it's very possible that this is connected to the Pauli release. The club was saying that it didn't have to release any more players and then all of a sudden it released Pauli and then this comes out? I kind of hope that is the case and that sorts it.
So am I putting you down for a NO Phil?
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
of 4 Next