Melbourne's Matterson offer

So it becomes more clearer, the $300k offered from Melbourne included $211,000 of that going towards Matterson's contract and $89,000 as a transfer fee. Instead of what we thought of $300k transfer fee and maybe taking Matto as well. 

So many felt the transfer fee was going on the cap of $211,000. Not correct, that would be for Matto's contract. That is not a great deal.

https://www.zerotackle.com/could-mattersons-injury-break-lomax-deadlock-230722/

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • If we can medically retired Matto then it's all a moot point anyway because we've solved our own problem. That article makes it seem like this scenario would make us more likely to accept the Storm offer, I would have thought it's the opposite.

    If we can medically retire Matto ourselves then the Storm literally have no leverage at all and nothing to offer us of interest or worth.

    Unless of course VLandys is going to go "full mask off corrupt puppet master" and tell us (quietly) that he will only allow the medical retirement to come off the cap if we accept the Storm offer. Which wouldn't surprise me.

    • If he medically retires we get all of his salary, so yeah makes no sense to accept.

    • Guarantee that the NRL will try that stunt. However they may be too shit scared to say stuff like this to us now. We have a Barrister SC on speed dial. 

    • It would not surprise me either Mr Captain, not one little bit.

      We are also, by design, a leaky ship right now. Scary stuff for a puppet master

  • So we would be left with $4ook freight...I thought they offered some bullshit like this

    Fuck I hate Melbourne

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Poppa replied to Blue Eel's discussion Trial #2, Game Day Blog v Roosters: We Just Won the Pre-Season Cup
"Why would you waste him in JF, he should be playing 5/8 in cup and if Pezit gets injured, he looks like he would be comfortable in the ones, everything you say, says to me"he is the plan" of having Pevit for one year only.
I'm still not convinced…"
2 minutes ago
LB replied to Blue Eel's discussion Trial #2, Game Day Blog v Roosters: We Just Won the Pre-Season Cup
"lol they complain cause he is not Payne Haas. What they don't realise is his minor details in attack by being the link man and in defence where his 2nd man in efforts were fantastic was the difference. He is there to set the tone in defence. Thats…"
7 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Your R1 vs Storm team list
"It is the same 1-17 as last night with Joash and Samrani
 
Done, sorted, how good."
10 minutes ago
EA replied to Blue Eel's discussion Trial #2, Game Day Blog v Roosters: We Just Won the Pre-Season Cup
"Lot of people on TCT are complaining about JDB. Yes he struggled a bit in attack which is natural since it's his first ever game for us but defensively I thought he was great"
13 minutes ago
More…