Melbourne's Matterson offer

So it becomes more clearer, the $300k offered from Melbourne included $211,000 of that going towards Matterson's contract and $89,000 as a transfer fee. Instead of what we thought of $300k transfer fee and maybe taking Matto as well. 

So many felt the transfer fee was going on the cap of $211,000. Not correct, that would be for Matto's contract. That is not a great deal.

https://www.zerotackle.com/could-mattersons-injury-break-lomax-deadlock-230722/

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • If we can medically retired Matto then it's all a moot point anyway because we've solved our own problem. That article makes it seem like this scenario would make us more likely to accept the Storm offer, I would have thought it's the opposite.

    If we can medically retire Matto ourselves then the Storm literally have no leverage at all and nothing to offer us of interest or worth.

    Unless of course VLandys is going to go "full mask off corrupt puppet master" and tell us (quietly) that he will only allow the medical retirement to come off the cap if we accept the Storm offer. Which wouldn't surprise me.

    • If he medically retires we get all of his salary, so yeah makes no sense to accept.

    • Guarantee that the NRL will try that stunt. However they may be too shit scared to say stuff like this to us now. We have a Barrister SC on speed dial. 

    • It would not surprise me either Mr Captain, not one little bit.

      We are also, by design, a leaky ship right now. Scary stuff for a puppet master

  • So we would be left with $4ook freight...I thought they offered some bullshit like this

    Fuck I hate Melbourne

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Poppa replied to Blue Eel's discussion Trial #2, Game Day Blog v Roosters: We Just Won the Pre-Season Cup
"My Mother once said to me when I was a about 10 years old.....haven't you got enough sense to get out of the rain David.
If the cap fits wear it....those silly enough to sit on a muddy hill do not need to sit there, they are not entertaining…"
2 minutes ago
Johnny Suede replied to Blue Eel's discussion Trial #2, Game Day Blog v Roosters: We Just Won the Pre-Season Cup
"Apparently your chance of being struck by lightening is one in a million. So, if there's a threat to the players who need to take cover, shouldn't fans, stuck on a muddy hill, be shown the same level of safety? "
12 minutes ago
Flow Basket replied to Blue Eel's discussion Trial #2, Game Day Blog v Roosters: We Just Won the Pre-Season Cup
"U can't have lightning breaks with beer prices so high and the way their checking bags just feels like someone's making money .while  kids over the road  standing in the rain with a fishing rods"
50 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 posted a discussion
Based on the pre-season trials, training reports, and incumbency, I’ve settled on a top 19 that largely picks itself — particularly the starting top 13, which I think is pretty much locked in.Samrani, for mine, has done enough to be locked into a…
58 minutes ago
More…