You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"You're comparing chalk and cheese, two totally different players."
"Sort. Of- think the year for footballer start November so it be the remaining 3/4 I.e. if on. 600K 450 cap relief"
"Thats a good side bem. Joash looked more confident and stronger in the trials, and his quick footwork really confused the opposition. If he's on the bench he needs to get onto the park"
"Iongi; JAC, Russell, Penisini, Simonsson; Pezet, Moses;
Hopgood, Smith, Paulo; Williams, Kautoga; Doorey.
Bench: Da Silva, Tuivati, De Belin, Walker, Samrani, Papalii. "
Hopgood, Smith, Paulo; Williams, Kautoga; Doorey.
Bench: Da Silva, Tuivati, De Belin, Walker, Samrani, Papalii. "
Replies
meh
As long as the NRL is consistent this is a non issue
Look at the Watmough injury case
the NRL approved that but knocked back Brett Stewart and probably but not yet officially Matai.
I'll set out the facts for the last time. Watmough suffered an new injury which ended his career, both Stewart and Matai were signed with their existing injuries so they get no relief.
In summary for career ending injuries,
new injury = not counted on cap
existing injury = still counted on cap
Testimonials should be for raising money for charity as opposing to a fatter pocket lining for the players.
true but that is another argument
WTF!! How is this fair?
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 5 Next