Just say Out or Keep
No longer winded answers,
OUT or KEEP thats it
We'll tally the votes 🗳 and find out the verdict
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Yes"
"out, if the guy was any good he would have signed Kurt Capewell before origin squads got picked."
"Well none of the successful clubs would let their GM go. Let's be fair. The only one maybe Cameron if Cleary takes that role. Though how much was him or wha lt Gould set up and Cleary continued? When he was at Parra i remember many abusing him…"
"OUT "
Replies
If you oust MON, you might as well sack Ryles, he has more say and sway regarding recruitment. Tell me one player who didn't sign with us and quoted "i did not sign because of MON". Richardson is a short term gain, with a long term pain.
Well it's been known that MON is hard to deal with by a number of agents, that's enough of a reason to dismiss him
The only thing I have heard is with James Galvin saying he dealt with Ben Rogers more as he is head of recruitment, and Ryles. He only saw MON once and he was fine with Galvin's management, Lachlan and James. But Rogers and Ryles were the ones they saw the most for the deal.
So you're saying is Mark is untouchable? The whole football department falls under Mark O’Neill and the squad assembled under his guidance is bottom 4 if not bottom 2
He has 8 + years to fix the issues, he goes before anyone else. Ryles had and still has a massive clean out to contend with.
Where were the underlying players ready to take over those who departed. Why was cup full of other clubs rejected players, rather than development players??
This all comes under O'neill as the head of football operations
True, though he has a say so does MON. They both need to be aligned. There would be players MON and/or Rogers want and Ryles says no and the other way around. But Ryles does have a say as he should.
O.U.T
Out
MON & Rogers - OUT
Agreed
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
of 6 Next