Replies

  • If you oust MON, you might as well sack Ryles, he has more say and sway regarding recruitment. Tell me one player who didn't sign with us and quoted "i did not sign because of MON". Richardson is a short term gain, with a long term pain.

    • Well it's been known that MON is hard to deal with by a number of agents, that's enough of a reason to dismiss him

      • The only thing I have heard is with James Galvin saying he dealt with Ben Rogers more as he is head of recruitment, and Ryles. He only saw MON once and he was fine with Galvin's management, Lachlan and James. But Rogers and Ryles were the ones they saw the most for the deal.

    • So you're saying is Mark is untouchable? The whole football department falls under Mark O’Neill and the squad assembled under his guidance is bottom 4 if not bottom 2

      He has 8 + years to fix the issues,  he goes before anyone else.  Ryles had and still has a massive clean out to contend with. 

      • Where were the underlying players ready to take over those who departed.   Why was cup full of other clubs rejected players,  rather than development players??

         

        This all comes under O'neill as the head of football operations 

    • True, though he has a say so does MON. They both need to be aligned. There would be players MON and/or Rogers want and Ryles says no and the other way around. But Ryles does have a say as he should.

  • O.U.T

  • Out 

  • MON & Rogers - OUT

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Mallee57 replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"I assume that your comment is inclusive of everyone 😉. Not just 'yours truly' The unfortunate thing is Michael that everyone interprets blogs and comments differently. Some are more sensitive than others. An innocent comment or even blog can easily…"
2 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Mark O’Neill Keep or Out - The ultimate Vote
"Just a message to those who were using the scapegoat previously.  This has nothing to do with anyone being a scapegoat or a knee jerk reaction to our recent performances. 
Its a result for accountability, and the  the overall performance based on 8…"
24 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Mark O’Neill Keep or Out - The ultimate Vote
"Yes"
34 minutes ago
Last place replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Mark O’Neill Keep or Out - The ultimate Vote
"out, if the guy was any good he would have signed Kurt Capewell before origin squads got picked."
36 minutes ago
More…