Replies

    • Marl and Intrest....yep Chiefy is the brains behind the Trio!

  • Who replaces him? My 9 year old schnauzer would do a better job than the imbeciles currently running the joint.

  • YAY GOOD NEWS

    TAKE BA WITH YOU TOO

    • Gee and we have gone so bad under his tutelage....haven't we????.... how many clubs would like to have our record in the past 5 years??

      Some of the genious's on here say they could do better whereas the people on here would not have a clue.

      Parra pride says good news and take BA with you.....God help their replacements to put up with this lot.....the knives would be out before you could say "jack the ripper". 

  • The Tigers are now chasing  Michael Cheika for the role.

    Looks like we will be stuck with O'Neil after all 😪

     

    • What' a relief Bem , the club can now continue being held to ransom by players and get pay overs . 

      • Yep.

        I'm sure some around here are happy with that news though as they prefer mediocrety rather than rock the boat and try something new.

      • That's been going on a lot longer than O'Neill's tenure here.

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Ten years of poor defence, terrible use of the bench and no premiership with a squad capable of winning a couple.

      Rinse Wash Repeat. 

  • See ya dopey.  Take your sex fingers back to Tigertown where they were before they decided you wernt up to their standards and you came groveling over here for a meal ticket. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion NRL THREATEN 10-YEAR BAN FOR R360 DEFECTORS
"Yeah true. Lee Hangipitalis was on SEN saying they can't do it, then brought up why just R360 not Union or AFL even? 
Thats why I was doubtful, but they've done it and I'm all for it. More likely players will try to sue the NRL to let them in but as…"
3 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion NRL THREATEN 10-YEAR BAN FOR R360 DEFECTORS
"Longfin, yep. It's a declaration of intent — optics — without any legal teeth.
The NRL could refuse contract approvals over whatever goobley gook. We'll see.
PS: The NRL gave a reason for Izzy:  He Failed the Inclusiveness Test.
 "
10 minutes ago
The Captain replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion NRL THREATEN 10-YEAR BAN FOR R360 DEFECTORS
"Restraint of trade and non-compete are legal in Australia. They're often flimsy and super hard (sometimes impossible) to legally enforce.
But this idea that restraint of trade clauses are illegal in Australia aren't correct. Basically every employer…"
12 minutes ago
iamnot replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion NRL THREATEN 10-YEAR BAN FOR R360 DEFECTORS
"And it couldn't apply to players who are currently contracted, negoatiating to play R360 at the conclusion of their current contract. That would be a restraint of trade. 
It could only apply to someone like Lomax, who is wanting to break a contract…"
31 minutes ago
More…