They were saying on 360 last night Tigers may want to offload him and pay some freight. Would he go any good at hooker?
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"You know GL that Moses and Brown get described that way 50% of the time because their critics know no better.
You can only play as well as the opposition lets you but in cases like Cleary being quiet as you describe it can only because he is not…"
You can only play as well as the opposition lets you but in cases like Cleary being quiet as you describe it can only because he is not…"
"Fellow Black's (not sure that is a good description) may not be the advocates of Uncle Tom, which again is a mischeifious description, you sit out in your right wing perch and keep strirring the same pot. What do you add to the discussion in doing…"
"Correction, Grant not a premiership winner."
"We do not need to walk in lockstep to walk with each other and be Australians. Exactly right but we do need to respect each other's beliefs of what it means to be Australian. I'm just so sick of people pushing their own agendas in this area. The…"
Replies
In attack he could offer value, but he'd be a liability in defence. Maybe off the bench
From the figures they were talking (which could be all pure bullshit) for the tigers to get rid of him to another club they would have to pay about half his 2023 salary - $600k was the number provided. Do you think his defence could be improved/adapted to suit dummy half. How would Api Korisau go defending in the halves for example? I'm sure his rate of missed tackles would increase. Brooks is a player that needs a change of scenery
Moses was just as shit and now he is a reliable defender at the Eels. At hooker Brooks will have more support around him.
I think he'll make a great hooker, looks to have a nice backpussy.
Good grief, this comment escalated real quick. I'll take your word for it Kurupt.
He does have speed, and a lefty kick from dummy half is always handy.
No way Brett. You're kidding signing a player who can't defend at hooker.
I didn't say we should sign him Chief, I merely pointed out his good qualities.
Yes well I gathered you'd like a hooker off the bench
How do you know he can't defend at hooker?
Coz I've watched him tackle. You should watch him too that way you'll understand. You don't need to much of a sample size. About 10-15 games should be enough.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 10 Next