Luke Brooks

They were saying on 360 last night Tigers may want to offload him and pay some freight. Would he go any good at hooker? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • In attack he could offer value, but he'd be a liability in defence. Maybe off the bench

    • From the figures they were talking (which could be all pure bullshit) for the tigers to get rid of him to another club they would have to pay about half his 2023 salary - $600k was the number provided. Do you think his defence could be improved/adapted to suit dummy half. How would Api Korisau go defending in the halves for example? I'm sure his rate of missed tackles would increase. Brooks is a player that needs a change of scenery 

      • Moses was just as shit and now he is a reliable defender at the Eels. At hooker Brooks will have more support around him. 

        I think he'll make a great hooker, looks to have a nice backpussy.

        • Good grief, this comment escalated real quick. I'll take your word for it Kurupt.

      • He does have speed, and a lefty kick from dummy half is always handy.

        • No way Brett. You're kidding signing a player who can't defend at hooker. 

          • I didn't say we should sign him Chief, I merely pointed out his good qualities. 

          • How do you know he can't defend at hooker?

            • Coz I've watched him tackle. You should watch him too that way you'll understand. You don't need to much of a sample size. About 10-15 games should be enough. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

The Badger replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - SG Ball Watchlist
"Some more juniors going elsewhere ...
Fizz Latapu, Michael Fililava and Lorima Saukuru have all decided to take their talents to St George.
Are these guys a loss we can't afford or were they additional to our needs?"
19 minutes ago
The Badger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion ‘Leaks and grandstanding’: Storm boss unloads on Eels over Lomax
"I don't believe this hearing Feb12-13 is about compensation but just whether (or not) Parra can continue to stop Lomax joining any NRL team without our permission.
If it expands to other issues it will be dragging out for a year or so."
35 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion ‘Leaks and grandstanding’: Storm boss unloads on Eels over Lomax
"I think the end result will be they offering 500k and the courts dictating that that would be a fair amount.   It won’t come down to the Storm losing a player of note.
If thats the case i can't see how the club could still hold onto the agreement as…"
1 hour ago
Troy Wade replied to Steel be with you's discussion 2026 Parramatta Eels Season Preview
"With a full pre - season under JR top 6. Only if Moses plays 80% of games. In my opinion Pezet will be a real asset to Mitch's game - and Iongi will only get better. For a kid so young he is elite. Future Origin player and Daily M winner... Let's go…"
1 hour ago
More…