They were saying on 360 last night Tigers may want to offload him and pay some freight. Would he go any good at hooker?
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Well next year we have money, as seen how we offered Barnett and Keaon big coin. But you have to remember, as per NRL rules, a club has to spend minimum 95% of their cap. Currently the cap is around $12mil. Meaning 5% of the what can be left is…"
"Cap restrictions?, we lost a shit load of players on big contracts and replaced them with fringe players and juniors, if we don't have enough cap space to sign a couple of really good quality players than that proves mon and the recruitment team are…"
"You really are Delusional and need a lot of help or maybe as Pop has said your just a plant put on hear just to annoy the crap out people with stupid comments.. if not please get the help you need . Or as i said there is 16 other teams in th…"
"If we are to improve defensively we need to start planting our flag in the ground with regards to combinations especially on the edge.It's consistency in selection imo that we'll start seeing real improvement.This is where injury and depth has…"
Replies
In attack he could offer value, but he'd be a liability in defence. Maybe off the bench
From the figures they were talking (which could be all pure bullshit) for the tigers to get rid of him to another club they would have to pay about half his 2023 salary - $600k was the number provided. Do you think his defence could be improved/adapted to suit dummy half. How would Api Korisau go defending in the halves for example? I'm sure his rate of missed tackles would increase. Brooks is a player that needs a change of scenery
Moses was just as shit and now he is a reliable defender at the Eels. At hooker Brooks will have more support around him.
I think he'll make a great hooker, looks to have a nice backpussy.
Good grief, this comment escalated real quick. I'll take your word for it Kurupt.
He does have speed, and a lefty kick from dummy half is always handy.
No way Brett. You're kidding signing a player who can't defend at hooker.
I didn't say we should sign him Chief, I merely pointed out his good qualities.
Yes well I gathered you'd like a hooker off the bench
How do you know he can't defend at hooker?
Coz I've watched him tackle. You should watch him too that way you'll understand. You don't need to much of a sample size. About 10-15 games should be enough.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 10 Next