Luke Brooks

They were saying on 360 last night Tigers may want to offload him and pay some freight. Would he go any good at hooker? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • In attack he could offer value, but he'd be a liability in defence. Maybe off the bench

    • From the figures they were talking (which could be all pure bullshit) for the tigers to get rid of him to another club they would have to pay about half his 2023 salary - $600k was the number provided. Do you think his defence could be improved/adapted to suit dummy half. How would Api Korisau go defending in the halves for example? I'm sure his rate of missed tackles would increase. Brooks is a player that needs a change of scenery 

      • Moses was just as shit and now he is a reliable defender at the Eels. At hooker Brooks will have more support around him. 

        I think he'll make a great hooker, looks to have a nice backpussy.

        • Good grief, this comment escalated real quick. I'll take your word for it Kurupt.

      • He does have speed, and a lefty kick from dummy half is always handy.

        • No way Brett. You're kidding signing a player who can't defend at hooker. 

          • I didn't say we should sign him Chief, I merely pointed out his good qualities. 

          • How do you know he can't defend at hooker?

            • Coz I've watched him tackle. You should watch him too that way you'll understand. You don't need to much of a sample size. About 10-15 games should be enough. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Prof. Daz replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Spagnolo launches another campaign to undermine the club
"Even the Oompa Loompas were complicit in Willy Wonka's dark sh*t, and that's before we get to truly evil orange motherf***ers"
17 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Randy, it seems to mean Kane is trying to white ant the Parramatta case.
1) A restraint of trade case is going to be in trouble if the employee had no idea what was going on. But Kane adds the adverb "apparently" to every instance in which he refers…"
27 minutes ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"The Storm is owned by a consortium of wealthy business owners:
Executive Management | Storm"
42 minutes ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
" pretty sure the nrl dont have any shares of melbourne anymore"
2 hours ago
More…