Luke Brooks

They were saying on 360 last night Tigers may want to offload him and pay some freight. Would he go any good at hooker? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • In attack he could offer value, but he'd be a liability in defence. Maybe off the bench

    • From the figures they were talking (which could be all pure bullshit) for the tigers to get rid of him to another club they would have to pay about half his 2023 salary - $600k was the number provided. Do you think his defence could be improved/adapted to suit dummy half. How would Api Korisau go defending in the halves for example? I'm sure his rate of missed tackles would increase. Brooks is a player that needs a change of scenery 

      • Moses was just as shit and now he is a reliable defender at the Eels. At hooker Brooks will have more support around him. 

        I think he'll make a great hooker, looks to have a nice backpussy.

        • Good grief, this comment escalated real quick. I'll take your word for it Kurupt.

      • He does have speed, and a lefty kick from dummy half is always handy.

        • No way Brett. You're kidding signing a player who can't defend at hooker. 

          • I didn't say we should sign him Chief, I merely pointed out his good qualities. 

          • How do you know he can't defend at hooker?

            • Coz I've watched him tackle. You should watch him too that way you'll understand. You don't need to much of a sample size. About 10-15 games should be enough. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓 replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"Pops, ask your wifey Marcia to check your tyre pressures. Im not sure where she's going to insert the guage pop, but you could be on a winner tonight "
39 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"This is what Stefano said, October last year about leaving us: “Everyone had their say about it and what was going on with my brother, but it wasn’t that."
 


“They told me that I wasn’t going to be a part of the rotation going forward and that I…"
1 hour ago
Clintorian replied to Roy tannous's discussion Jake Clifford?
"Clifford is the definition of 'bog average'. I cannot honestly remember anything he's ever done on the footy field, barely even noticed him. Hard pass."
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"Never was much of an under armer Christee, wife said I spin my balls and stay in too long.....that was sometime back in the previous century!
All said in done it will be wonderful too have two hands again, if only I had something rigid to guide…"
1 hour ago
More…