Luke Brooks

They were saying on 360 last night Tigers may want to offload him and pay some freight. Would he go any good at hooker? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • In attack he could offer value, but he'd be a liability in defence. Maybe off the bench

    • From the figures they were talking (which could be all pure bullshit) for the tigers to get rid of him to another club they would have to pay about half his 2023 salary - $600k was the number provided. Do you think his defence could be improved/adapted to suit dummy half. How would Api Korisau go defending in the halves for example? I'm sure his rate of missed tackles would increase. Brooks is a player that needs a change of scenery 

      • Moses was just as shit and now he is a reliable defender at the Eels. At hooker Brooks will have more support around him. 

        I think he'll make a great hooker, looks to have a nice backpussy.

        • Good grief, this comment escalated real quick. I'll take your word for it Kurupt.

      • He does have speed, and a lefty kick from dummy half is always handy.

        • No way Brett. You're kidding signing a player who can't defend at hooker. 

          • I didn't say we should sign him Chief, I merely pointed out his good qualities. 

          • How do you know he can't defend at hooker?

            • Coz I've watched him tackle. You should watch him too that way you'll understand. You don't need to much of a sample size. About 10-15 games should be enough. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

RV replied to jamie's discussion Ryles the Super Coach
"He came up through the Bellamy system which was hugely successful but built upon the wrestle. Has the game changed too much for that to work any more? Judging by Melbourne's results that may be the case. "
7 minutes ago
LB replied to Snottie Pimpin's discussion Centres
"I will say, seeing Saab being used on the inside in the middle to breakthrough is eye watering for Eels fans wanting that."
24 minutes ago
LB replied to Snottie Pimpin's discussion Centres
"Just remember, it was only at the start of the week Russell was being used as an example of why R&R and MON are so inept letting him walk for the money he was offered. Now it is he cannot play. So what is it? He can play and the agenda is MON is an…"
25 minutes ago
Eel for life replied to Roy tannous's discussion My takeaways from today
"Some very poor defence lead to some piss weak tries. Made Fogarty look like a superstar when he scored and the simple one on one missed tackle from Sean Russel on Garrick was diabolical"
29 minutes ago
More…