The article can be found on Fox Sports.
For the more savvy legal eagles on the site, what does this mean and does it implicate the Storm as it proves they engaged in illegal dealings with a player under contract?
Not only is this looking real bad for them, it looks increasingle poor optics for Lomax who showed little regard for the contract's worth and value not only with Parra, but also the NRL.
It would be nice to see a little backbone here by the NRL and not screw over Parra for doing the right thing by the player, even though Storm and Lomax look Guilty AF.
Bring in the Integrity Unit for this one and buckle up, I think we're going to see even more shady shenannigans.
Replies
Utterly disgraceful really. Where are the days of respect, decency and doing the right thing
Lol cant make this shit up. They believe they are victims to the pr...
Narcs always do
and they are the narc team of the NRL
You know how the joke goes that if you attend a sports game in Tasmania with 10kor more people, there will still be only about 10 families represented? Well here in Melbourne if you go to AAMI with 20k Storm fans there are only 10 brains in attendance, and half of those are the few Brave Eels fans there. Only this is not a joke. It's fact
The NRL just updated their anti-tampering laws, too. If Storm tampered, regardless of whether the new laws do or do not retrospectively apply to Storm tampering, from a public policy perspective doesn't it leave V'Landys only one option: we don't like tampering, Melbourne tampered, therefore . .. ???
Or will V'Landys give the big clubs a free pass?
It will be a slap on the wrist for Melbourne, but if a lowly team tampers, they'll throw the book at them. The NRL are so predictable.
But remember, to Storm fans they are the victims in the media. Despite the fact channel 9 had Billy Slater on the GF telecast and said "4x premiership winner" acknowledging cheating comps count.
NRL will do nothing to Melbourne, they will keep it hush and take over from there either by dealing with a fair trade or compensation to hush us or just allowing Melbourne to move on quietly.
Something else, that literally changes the whole thing.
With Documents that now prove Lomax had signed with R360 before getting a release from the Eels and
V'Landys NRL introduced a new rule that states 10 year ban for Player and for Player Agents signing with R360.
Thats game over. The NRL must now sanction Lomax with the 10 year Ban as well as Schifcofski and his Partner Gillis.
Lomax plays for no one till 2036. Isn't that what's supposed to happen now. The NrL should have already come out and stated they have opened an investigation into Lomax, shouldn't they.
They wont, we all know they wont as R360 are no threat. Issue will come if R360 does get going in 2028 after the RWC and is serious. V'Landys probably thinks since it died down that is it, there for since they are not a threat on NRL players fair game.
If he played for Storm and we wanted him though.....
But Lomax is now the prodigal son of the NRL.
He signed the contract which means a 10 year ban from the NRL.
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
of 7 Next