The article can be found on Fox Sports.

For the more savvy legal eagles on the site, what does this mean and does it implicate the Storm as it proves they engaged in illegal dealings with a player under contract?

Not only is this looking real bad for them, it looks increasingle poor optics for Lomax who showed little regard for the contract's worth and value not only with Parra, but also the NRL.

It would be nice to see a little backbone here by the NRL and not screw over Parra for doing the right thing by the player, even though Storm and Lomax look Guilty AF.

Bring in the Integrity Unit for this one and buckle up, I think we're going to see even more shady shenannigans.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

      • 31081637097?profile=RESIZE_710x

  • Utterly disgraceful really. Where are the days of respect, decency and doing the right thing 

    • Narcs always do 

      and they are the narc team of the NRL 

    • You know how the joke goes that if you attend a sports game in Tasmania with 10kor more people, there will still be only about 10 families represented? Well here in Melbourne if you go to AAMI with 20k Storm fans there are only 10 brains in attendance, and half of those are the few Brave Eels fans there. Only this is not a joke. It's fact

  • The NRL just updated their anti-tampering laws, too. If Storm tampered, regardless of whether the new laws do or do not retrospectively apply to Storm tampering, from a public policy perspective doesn't it leave V'Landys only one option: we don't like tampering, Melbourne tampered, therefore . .. ???

    Or will V'Landys give the big clubs a free pass?

    • It will be a slap on the wrist for Melbourne, but if a lowly team tampers, they'll throw the book at them. The NRL are so predictable. 

  • Something else, that literally changes the whole thing. 

    With Documents that now prove Lomax had signed with R360 before getting a release from the Eels  and 

    V'Landys NRL introduced a new rule that states 10 year ban for Player and for Player Agents signing with R360.

    Thats game over. The NRL must now sanction Lomax with the 10 year Ban as well as Schifcofski and his Partner Gillis.

    Lomax plays for no one till 2036. Isn't that what's supposed to happen now. The NrL should have already come out and stated they have opened an investigation into Lomax, shouldn't they.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Longfin Eel replied to Clintorian's discussion Lomax Update - Zac Lomax entered into preliminary contracts with R360 and the Melbourne Storm prior to being given his blessing by Parramatta
"One thing's for certain, the NRL want this done and dusted before it opens up their multiple decades worth of dirty laundry. Interesting times..."
2 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to Clintorian's discussion Lomax Update - Zac Lomax entered into preliminary contracts with R360 and the Melbourne Storm prior to being given his blessing by Parramatta
"If i can jump in a little. Im not sure that the court can rule on fair exchange. The petition is for an Eels perspective only.
Ie: are the terms of the contract binding or not.
The whole process would need to be expanded for the court to consider…"
10 minutes ago
Steel be with you posted a discussion
Like I do every year with my Youtube channel I preview Parramatta's 2026 NRL season. I would be interested to know your feedback on the video if you do watch it and let me know where you think Parramata will finish in 2026 along with some players…
14 minutes ago
Longfin Eel replied to Clintorian's discussion Lomax Update - Zac Lomax entered into preliminary contracts with R360 and the Melbourne Storm prior to being given his blessing by Parramatta
"It will be a slap on the wrist for Melbourne, but if a lowly team tampers, they'll throw the book at them. The NRL are so predictable. "
16 minutes ago
More…