The article can be found on Fox Sports.

For the more savvy legal eagles on the site, what does this mean and does it implicate the Storm as it proves they engaged in illegal dealings with a player under contract? Not only is this looking real bad for them, it looks increasingle poor optics for Lomax who showed little regard for the contract's worth and value not only with Parra, but also the NRL. It would be nice to see a little backbone here by the NRL and not screw over Parra for doing the right thing by the player, even though Storm and Lomax look Guilty AF. Bring in the Integrity Unit for this one and buckle up, I think we're going to see even more shady shenannigans.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

    • It's been us against the NRL since 23.

      • There are other clubs in same boat too not just us.

    • Well Longfin, the nrl certainly have not acted well in this case at all. Hope they've learned something about their okaying Lomax back to sign up with storm stance too. It was absolutely disgraceful form from nrl.

      I noted in wording of Beach's email where he states beautifully ...

      "The NRL are aware of the conditions associated with the release.

      “Our Club believes in the importance of observing contractual obligations. Contracts allow Clubs and players to operate with certainty and within a framework of rules. Contracts are the very stuff that any member of the community and companies have to honour in order to ensure that there is fair dealing. The same applies to the NRL,Clubs and players.

      reckon that was a dig at nrl too :)

      btw the current wording in that last sentence has now been altered as posted on parra website haha maybe the nrl did not like it. But Beach was totally right!

  • Explains why the dope was trying to grandstand this morning.

    This bitch be TRIPPing

    • Haha absolutely. He has actually 'tripped' himself up a few times today
      one of the best ones was how he implied we needed to free up cap space to sign pezet and tried to ship Lomax off haha as if Dylbags money was not enough to sign pezet ...funny stuff.

      His words are trash compared to our Beach ;)

       

      • Not to mention we signed Pezet a month before releasing Lomax

        • Anasta has come out and said Pezet deal was worked after Lomax release was set to 🤣

      • 31081637097?profile=RESIZE_710x

  • Utterly disgraceful really. Where are the days of respect, decency and doing the right thing 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read