From The Sydney Morning Herald...

Melbourne’s pursuit of Zac Lomax could prove more costly than expected if the NRL deems the club’s promise to cover the exiled winger’s legal bills should be included in the Storm’s salary cap.

Parramatta began legal proceedings to prevent Lomax from joining the Storm, given his release from a four-year contract was contingent on the Eels providing written consent. The Blues winger was granted a release to join rebel rugby competition R360, but has been left in limbo after its inaugural season was put back until 2028.

Lomax’s hopes of making his Melbourne debut against former club Parramatta in the opening round have been thwarted after his court hearing was scheduled to end a day after the AAMI Park clash.

According to court documents made available last week, the Eels claim the Storm indemnified Lomax’s court expenses.

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/lomax-legal-promise-could-create-salary-cap-headache-for-storm-20260218-p5o39m.html

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

        • This is how much the NRL looks after the "glamour" clubs. Shibasaki, current SOO and Australian rep, is on a miserly $140k this year. How does the NRL accept this.

          • NRL accept it right in the portal-hole

      • 31091389667?profile=RESIZE_584x

        Something along the lines of this I think they are looking at in the front office. Need experience in the middle, a 1-2 year starting halves option. and en edge player, ideally experienced.

         

        • You can throw Lorima Seuseu in that list as well.

          • Lorima Seuseu has the potential to be our best outside back produced at the club in a very long time. He is like Makisini from the Tigers. I rate him more than any other centre and winger in the juniors at the eels. However he only turns 16 this year so long way to go.

        • very much doubt volkman will get extended dynasty

          • Only reason I think he remains at the club is on a minimum wage deal to have someone integrated in the culture available as an experienced head in NSW cup to help steer the team around. I agree he is not going to be a priority signing and he hasn't kicked on as expected in the NRL and most likely he won't be poached by a rival. Do you think he'd be worth keeping for that kind of situation?

    • I would love Brisbane to chase this option, it would absolutely twist Lomax's nuts in a vice between finding a contract in the NRL and not losing his legal case, but also screw over Storm who are paying for his legal bills, would have to take his legals bills into their cap, and don't end up with Lomax in the team!

      That would be glorious if it happened, but we're not that lucky.

      • Clint, I still reckon Canberra were actually interested.

        • They have a great young backline, I'd be surprised if Sticky tried to bring Lomax in and break that. Could be wrong though

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Snottie Pimpin replied to Roy tannous's discussion Jdb junior paulo 👉🚪👋
"We had 20% of the ball their first stint on the field. 
Expecting both to get better as the season goes on . Game is too quick for the best of middles at the moment . "
43 seconds ago
Parrafan101 replied to Joel K's discussion Credit to the bench
"I feel JDB needs to start, towards the end when JBD came back on our defence felt more a bit clean through the middle."
48 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Joel K's discussion Credit to the bench
"Tuivaiti to start, and Junior on the bench could be a really easy fix. Honestly, I haven't seen Tui have a bad game yet, give him the start and see how he handles it."
57 minutes ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Angry Eel's discussion 3,2,1s
"3. Iongi
2. Walker
1. Big Sam"
1 hour ago
More…