From The Sydney Morning Herald...

Melbourne’s pursuit of Zac Lomax could prove more costly than expected if the NRL deems the club’s promise to cover the exiled winger’s legal bills should be included in the Storm’s salary cap.

Parramatta began legal proceedings to prevent Lomax from joining the Storm, given his release from a four-year contract was contingent on the Eels providing written consent. The Blues winger was granted a release to join rebel rugby competition R360, but has been left in limbo after its inaugural season was put back until 2028.

Lomax’s hopes of making his Melbourne debut against former club Parramatta in the opening round have been thwarted after his court hearing was scheduled to end a day after the AAMI Park clash.

According to court documents made available last week, the Eels claim the Storm indemnified Lomax’s court expenses.

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/lomax-legal-promise-could-create-salary-cap-headache-for-storm-20260218-p5o39m.html

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Dont you love a feel good story !

    Love that if Melbourne were to win and Lomax's contract with the Storm was confirmed, the fact that Lomax's legal bills would go on top of their salary cap even though they don't have that cap space is just poetic.

    That the storm may have to release a player to stay under the cap is interesting. Any chance that we could still end up a player swap even if Lomax / Storm won the case would just be awesome. Gotta laugh at this, if it were to ring true..

    • Beach should text Abdo to apply the blowtorch to the salary cap auditors...

    • I hope in the end we do one of storm players but saying that if we do well he give us 100%  every game

  • Ironically, around 13 Jan, when Storm agreed to pay Lomax's legal fees (could cause cap implications) was also when Tripp allegedly called Beach to threaten that the Eels could be hit with cap sanctions by the NRL.
     
    NRL.com official salary cap rules:

    "If a player is receiving money from any person as a way of inducing him to play for the club, then that money will be included in the Salary Cap." https://www.nrl.com/operations/integrity/salary-cap/

    Will paying for his legal fees count as an inducement?

    • Damn well should. 

      Given we had to include Fui's family flights then these legal fees should for sure.

    • The Storm will not enforce this. That is my gut feeling here; they should but we know they no nuts.

    • Wow... HOE, this is what I was looking for as I wasn't sure how Storm could be forced to pay for his legal bills.

      THIS IS HUGE!

       

      • Clintorian, I'd be flabbergasted if this isn't casually swept under the rug.

        Regardless of outcomes, it makes me smile we are playing a different game —pulling the rug away with the power of the subpoena.

        Legal muscle and daylight. If you can't beat em or join em, this is the way. We probably have in the past, but I can't recall a time we did this...

      • Plus it could put them over the cap.

  • Eels are playing this beautifully 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Yehez replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion VEGAS - HERE WE COME !!!! & its not the Storm !
"Ah fair point. But then again wouldn't they make more in Vegas? Maybe they did the math. "
2 minutes ago
Michael W. replied to Hell On Eels's discussion R3: Danger Game as Desperate Dragons Hunt First Win
"Hopgood was one of our best last year when he went to the front row, no chance of him being dropped."
50 minutes ago
Parra Dice replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion VEGAS - HERE WE COME !!!! & its not the Storm !
"Vomit Beer"
58 minutes ago
Flow Basket replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion VEGAS - HERE WE COME !!!! & its not the Storm !
"My life forbids me from leaving Western Sydney but I will be watching at my local with a ice cold pint of VB"
1 hour ago
More…