Lomax Gone

Just listening to Braith Anasta who has stated that Lomax won't be playing with Parra in 2026 and that's he's basically signed with Rugby Union. Anasta reckons he will not play NRL again and will likely move to UK to prepare for the October start of his Union deal. Hope this isn't correct but it wouldn't surprise me. Anasta is normally reasonably accurate. So Eels need a new winger for 26 onwards

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

    • Perhaps we are making room to sign Tino. We are going to sign him for 1 year 1.8million then send him of to Melbourne for the next 4 years while agreeing to pay half his contract. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣. I hope everyone running this club gets sacked, especially MON that bloke hasn't landed one origin calibre signing since RCG. Ryles signed Josh and BA signed Lomax and he's leaving

      • I do believe we will have a good crack at Tino, legitimately.

        • ...and others will also have a good crack at Tino, but illegitimately. 

          We know what that means for us. (it's a shit sandwich)

      • So if coaches are responsible for signing players, why are you blaming MON?

  • why do we continually get the shit sandwiches...what crossroads demon did we sell out to in the 80s for all the shit we have to put up with from chocking to spoons too signing dilemmas ffs

  • All is forgiven if we sign Keon Koloamatangi who wants more more then the $700,000 the Rabbitohs are currently paying him

    • I wonder what is there plan though? They signed Jonah to supposedly compete to win. If we keep losing players like Lomax we will be back at square 1. Not to mention last season we had Dylan Brown who is a better 6 then Pezet and Lomax and we were still fighting out of the spoon for half the season. Moses was injured but still. So far we look worse on paper if Lomax leaves

  • If it's true, Bailey steps straight into that wing spot and the 650k can be used to find other wing options. No point crying over spilt milk. We keep moving forward 

  • Seems about right. Eels aren't allowed to have rep players

  • As long as Simonsson is around and up for it, this is no big deal and alleviates some space. If we sign Garrick, even better.

    Simonsson - Penisini - Garrick - AddoCarr      is quite a good backline.

     

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Seraph replied to Eelawarra's discussion RYLES REVEALS WHY HE SIGNED PEZET FOR ONE YEAR
"Im curious to see the impact his signing will have on the teams morale. The club and coach have been saying they want players that want to be there... having a guy come in essentially as a stop over may disrupt what they've built over the last…"
1 minute ago
Poppa replied to Cumberland Eel's discussion Lomax Gone
"Absolute Rubbish, there is no replacement for Lomax, he is irreplacable.....if he has gone, there is a reason we don't know about. He is the only one out of all potentials to go to R360......something has happened????????
Bailey is a better centre…"
2 minutes ago
Frank The Tank replied to Cumberland Eel's discussion Lomax Gone
"They definitely are ATM. Head scratching stuff."
14 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Eelawarra's discussion RYLES REVEALS WHY HE SIGNED PEZET FOR ONE YEAR
"Is Ryles a qualified hypnotist?
Pezet had a get-out-of-Storm PO clause if Hughes, their half, resigned long-term. He did. So, why in the heck would he wait 4 years behind Moses?
Hence, no bona-fide contract on the table. Clear as day. Ryles knew it.…"
15 minutes ago
More…