Lomax gone immediately

Laters bro...

 

Eels' Club Statement

"The Parramatta Eels can confirm that Zac Lomax has been granted an immediate release from his playing contract to pursue opportunities outside the NRL.

The Club would like to thank Zac for his contribution during his time with the Eels in 2025 and we wish him all the best for the future."

 

Foxsport Article

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Bailey has done his hammy before he gets on the field for pre season. Hope they have made progress on someone else. 

  • You can't blame any player who leaves for the money they are being offerred. Imagine someone comes to you and says I will pay you three times as much for doing similar work. Just about everyone is taking it. 

    Good luck to him and thanks for being a great player for us for 2025. 

    • Good point, even if he plays for one year and gets the reported $3mil AUD, he would have needed to play 5 years before seeing that for Parramatta.

      If he plays 2 years, he is set for life with $6mil. He has no kids, is mid 20's, why not travel and earn a motza.

  • Well Braith Anastia was right. 

    parramatta has known this for some time now, that Lomax was leaving that's why they never released Simonson for. Ryles is smart he would have a plan knowing Lomax was going, otherwise he wouldn't of released him. Matterson will be next to go. We will definitely sign NAS now I reckon, but definitely need another 2 outside backs.

  • I reckon that Joash Papali will go into the wing in place of Lomax until they find a replacement 

    • Nah good fill in as emergency but not full-time starting. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Roy tannous's discussion Lomax gone immediately
"Mutts, I've never seen.a person do a complete 360 personality wise than yourself.  18 months ago you were mr positively and even called myself out on being negative on a few occasions.  Now there not one member who's more negative than yourself. …"
15 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Roy tannous's discussion Lomax gone immediately
"I didn't no jack sht was off contract "
39 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to Roy tannous's discussion Lomax gone immediately
"I'm pleased that this is how Ryles responded, perfect reaction to this situation."
54 minutes ago
iamnot replied to Roy tannous's discussion Lomax gone immediately
"the ban won't apply with the club releasing him, unless the NRL want to start a full on investigation into the dealings of Schifcofske and find evidence that negotiations with R360 have already taken place, whilst Lomax was still contracted. Whilst…"
58 minutes ago
More…