Replies

        • BA caused us this, his idea to sign him. That better EA? Hahaha

        • Six degrees of BA - i'll play

          BA signs Lomax, and BA is no longer here so maybe Lomax wanted out because of because he is missing out on Mrs Arthurs' cooking... 

          So technically BA being past his used-by date and booted is the cause of Lomax not wanting to stick around = BA's fault  

    • That's a guarantee 

  • Need to update the banner

    • Stick Moses or ado on it. That's club men 

  • Fuck him.  Honestly good luck to him if he wants to chase the cash. It's once in a lifetime money. 

    We finished 13th last year with him. He definitely does a lot of work out of the back field but he was pretty poor at times in attack. We've come back from bigger losses, Hayne, Foran, Semi, Jennings etc.

     

    The Foxx out played him this year in my opinion. 

     

    • Oi we finished 11th

    • He was good, very good. He some flaws in defence but let's face it he is a loss.

  • Cya Zac - enjoy Riyahd buddy

  • GOmax

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Bup replied to Roy tannous's discussion Lomax gone immediately
"Our start of sets were a massive problem for us in 25 , unless there's some signings up our sleeve ( if there was you'd think they'd announce it in the 48hrs after this breaking news) we're in strife.
We really need some punch to start sets or we'll…"
7 seconds ago
Blue Eel replied to LB's discussion The draw idea with 20 teams and the issues around it. (LONG BLOG)
"🫡"
23 seconds ago
The Badger replied to LB's discussion You are NRL chairman, how do you set out the season
"Parra has 27 byes and is fresh for the finals."
1 minute ago
The Badger replied to Johnnubond's discussion Adam Ritson on League365 Podcast
"Player that maybe could have lead us to another premiership if only he wasn't almost killed by a thug ...John Lomax.
Could have been our next Bear."
2 minutes ago
More…