31081258088?profile=RESIZE_710x

Storm chairman Matt Tripp took aim at Parramatta for what he saw as deliberately taking the dispute public, accusing the club of running to the media to control the narrative around the Zac Lomax saga. Tripp suggested the Eels chose headlines over resolution, portraying Lomax and Melbourne as acting in bad faith while ignoring the broader context — including the fact Parramatta would have gained adequate compensation for a player who had already vacated the club.

 

Tripp said Melbourne attempted to handle the matter quietly and professionally, offering compensation to avoid escalation, only for Parramatta to harden its stance and air the issue publicly. In his view, the decision to brief the media and frame the Storm as "villains" was unnecessary and misleading, turning a solvable contractual dispute into a drawn-out public fight that Parramatta itself helped inflame.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

    • Gold, Meelk, GOLD!!!

  • I'd continue the public awareness verbal-judo strategy pointing out Melbourne refused to release the Fox on compassionate grounds unless a fair player swap happened — for years until the Fox's contract expired.

    • HOE, not only do the Storm operate with multiple contracts for the same player, but also different ethics depending upon what suits them 

    • Sarannos knows how to fight apparently Straight & sideways...I feell bad for doubting him. Staunch

      Whenever you are in a fight give your opponent more of what they hate when they want it the least..... they hate us leaking and grandstanding because they don't have anything to leak that makes us look bad and everytime we grandstand the crowd cheers us on... So they have a cry like Sooky la-la's. and complain that we threw the sand in their vagina. It is hard when

      Supreme court, sunlight, grit and moxy. Punchiup & drag 'em down. Our narrative is solid and engaging. There's is  Eels are unreasonable and mean to us.

      Keep giving it to them ....No Lube, 

  • This bloke should be a politican with his BS spin.  Parrmatta signed Pezet before they released Lomax, Pezet first signed a 3 year contract with the Broncos staring in 2027 than signed 1 year with the eels for this season, nothing to do with Lomax.  Parra signed Brian Kelly after Lomax was released.  Stay strong Parra, take Lomax to court.

  • Of course they wanted the matter handled quietly and professionally. To the storm, this means, let us dictate what is going to happen and you losers just sit there and let us have our way.

    They're shocked that the Eels have not only stood up to them, but actually stitched them up in such a professional manner that they're resorting to a weak, public outcry, gaslighting us by stating we're trying to play this out in the media.

    Nice try dickhead. We all see the storm for what they are, cheating grubs. I hope we absolutely nail them in court.

  • Lol low balling offers for an international winger at Parras expense yer sure stick to it Parra don't be pushed around by this mob 

  • That's hilarious! Obviously the club is doing something right here. Melbourne are used to getting their own way and it's not working, which is frustrating them. Parra have been clear about what they are after, but Melbourne refuse to come to the table. It couldn't be simpler.

  • Storm wanting to pay $200K in compensation for an Australian Representative player and calling that professional, when they refused the Fox's release on compassionate grounds wanting a like for like player for years.

    The Bulldogs paid a $500,000 transfer fee to the Broncos for Karl Oloapu, a teenager who at that stage hadn't made his NRL debut.

    Unbelivable Hypocracy and disrespect from the Storm towards the Eels. Round 1 is going to be crazy.

  • Only thing that worries me is how "adequate compensation " is translated. 
    fact they have just upped their financial offer to us kinda seems what they are hinging on re wording...making seem like they are trying to persuade us thru greater financial gain being more 'adequate'

    i know it's not what we want and we've named players for swap but Im worried about the wording being a little ambiguous and sure hope Im very wrong on that.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

macybrown replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion ‘Leaks and grandstanding’: Storm boss unloads on Eels over Lomax
"again Prof "Media reports already showing that the Eels have flagged that Storm may have filed a preliminary contract for Lomax before commencing negotiations with Parramatta."...haha! Gawd I hope this is true🤞 Kinda explains why they haven't yet…"
21 minutes ago
macybrown replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion ‘Leaks and grandstanding’: Storm boss unloads on Eels over Lomax
"good point!"
30 minutes ago
macybrown replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion ‘Leaks and grandstanding’: Storm boss unloads on Eels over Lomax
"Prof you say, "Now Tripp wants to claim the Eels were secretly trying to dump Lomax, who was contracted until end of 2028, so they could secure a backup half until the end of 2026?" Im curious... did Tripper actually say this somewhere in print??…"
33 minutes ago
Hector replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion ‘Leaks and grandstanding’: Storm boss unloads on Eels over Lomax
"Grantrd Ballarat Beachworth Bright i like But Melbourne still a shit hole🙄"
41 minutes ago
More…