There is an alleged RLPA player poll being talked about in the podcast world that could provide explosive media click-bait when it's officially released soon.

Paul Kent’s May 25th podcast (from about the 34th minute) claims that around half the 56-57 odd RLPA poll respondents were senior players with 8+ years NRL experience (over 200 seasons of experience) and their concerns include:

  • half of the players don't enjoy game because of the new rules 
  • Over 80% believe referees dictating results 
  • a significant portion believe the refs influence games more than players
  • almost all believed intensity of the game and fatigue has increased significantly

What's interesting is this RLPA poll has been leaked before it's been made offical. 

Daz makes some valid points that this poll represents a very small sample and it could be widely misleading: "a coin toss".

Still, optics-wise, it’s not ideal, regardless of whether it's fair or not, representive of a broader playing group or not.

Whether that relatively small senior sample represents the broader playing group is difficult to determine. Younger players also have less to compare with than senior players. Also, senior players have a huge influence on younger players too.

It also clashes somewhat with the V’landyball marketing narrative of the game having record crowds, being bigger, faster, better and more entertaining than ever.

There are fans, including me, who aren’t entirely convinced either.

Average scores are now pushing beyond 50 points per game, the highest in history. 20 plus margins of blowouts are common now. Kent makes the valid point coaches fear fatigue: fatigue makes cowards of us all.

Not only that but the risk of injuries increase. With the clamp down on any head contact and force, even caused by ball-carriers falling into tackles, defences are pressured to be more passive.

Defences rarely can withstand more than 3 minutes of sustained pressure. 3 sets. That is based on the best the Panthers have defended without leaking a try.

Gus Gould has regularly commented on the unfair contest between attack and defence and it being next to impossible to have much defensive resilience, especially due to the new rules and huge number of restarts and penalties, and refereering interpretations and head-high issues.

All this doesn’t prove the game is “broken,” but it does suggest the ARLC and NRL should probably examine whether the balance between fatigue, speed, officiating influence and entertainment has shifted too far.

Some solid sources also suggest not all referees, privately, are on board with the new rules and where the game is heading and believe there is some bias.

Kent’s podcast also raised concerns about potential for match-fixing; integrity perceptions in the gambling era. It would be naive to think their aren't shady things happening in the game.

With the TV deal coming up, and Abdo resigning at an interesting point in time, it's food for thought for the game’s powerbrokers. A potential ticking time bomb.

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

      • Totally agree. I've been round a long time and seen a lot of changes to the game  i used to love watching and playing as a young bloke now being an old fart and seeing the way the game has gone ive got to the stage of not being able to even watch a full game on the tv . I've been a member and season ticket holder holder for more years than i can remember and am getting to the stage of not really caring if i go to a home game or not . Some will say it's because of the way our team has performed the last few years . Maybe got something to do with it but mainly it's the way the game has turned into touch football but mainly due to the stupid six agains and the way the officials control the game. In closing this just not the game i grew up with and its just not my cup of tea anymore. Just my humble opinion 

  • Got blog HOE! Meanwhile Pete s on long service for 4 months.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

JC replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"The cynical side of me took it as cheap for a half-back. Anasta is his agent so in his eyes pezet is the next big thing although he hasn't come close to proving that as yet."
5 minutes ago
Hector Bob Down replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kent: "Players Revolt & Ref Turmoil"; A Ticking Time Bomb?
"Totally agree. I've been round a long time and seen a lot of changes to the game  i used to love watching and playing as a young bloke now being an old fart and seeing the way the game has gone ive got to the stage of not being able to even watch a…"
7 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Hell On Eels's discussion V'landyball: The Momentum Wars
"I honestly hope we have an analytics division within the club to maximise dollar vs performance opportunities that's an area we can make gains.Maybe devise an RAS (relative athletic score)type system like in the nfl and then have a look at character…"
9 minutes ago
Yeah Man replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Daley “Moses injury is so minor he could probably play for Parra this weekend”
"To be fair Pezet is a 7 was MOM in the finals last year "
10 minutes ago
More…