Agree, but why are we only going for a down grade? JWH tackled looked far worse than Evans.
SuperEel 22 > Electric EelSeptember 10, 2019 at 7:59pm
Judiciary is more inclined to accept a downgrade. You're not arguing that your client didn't make contact with the head, just that it's not worth a grade two.
Electric Eel > SuperEel 22September 10, 2019 at 8:20pm
Which tackle was worse in your opinion Super? Just interested in your opinion. Either way, it is just ridiculous that players are now expected to miraculously pull out of tackles of smaller or falling players.
Kane’s 1st point of contact is the shoulder, a grade 2 is rediculous. Who knows what the judiciary will do but missing a final for a head high tackle which is a secondary impact is laughable.
"Hoe,
This is unexpected and a refreshing take on game day blog. A complete tangent change from normal, but refreshing. I still don't know if reading AI content is thrilling or cheating. I'm not sure how i reconcile that. hahahahaha I'll just have…"
"Talagi a good player but so is Iongi, it was basically a player swap so I don't pay to much attention to the "beat the old club thing" it was a win win move 😂"
"Two things....
I was gonna say Parra will win this until I read your Gough referee stat, and then I read your 200 game on big Junz, and remembered how well the storm do these big milestones and how Ryles wants to replicate them.
Parra in a real…"
Replies
x2
Based on this case and the W Chambers case V Manly, I have no doubt Evans will play now.
Yer mate got off, Kane Evans is using the same defence council. He is up in a hours time there saying. Canberra bloke is up now
Cheers for the update Shawny
Yer sorry think he’s using the same as the Canberra bloke now, and thanks for the useful information as well
canberra lost there case...there coach is a joke supporting the crabby pom..
Thank you for updates . We need him .
Agree, but why are we only going for a down grade? JWH tackled looked far worse than Evans.
Judiciary is more inclined to accept a downgrade. You're not arguing that your client didn't make contact with the head, just that it's not worth a grade two.
Which tackle was worse in your opinion Super? Just interested in your opinion. Either way, it is just ridiculous that players are now expected to miraculously pull out of tackles of smaller or falling players.
Kane’s 1st point of contact is the shoulder, a grade 2 is rediculous. Who knows what the judiciary will do but missing a final for a head high tackle which is a secondary impact is laughable.