Saw a rumour floating around that raiders and Fogarty may be heading in different directions. Would a 6-7 duo of Moses Fogarty work ? I'd probably play Moses at 6 in that case as he's a great runner of the footy but having 2 great kickers would also be great. Would be more a short term move but it makes sense.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
Replies
Need a genuine 6 ( GALVIN ) my opinion only
He's the long term play for sure but even then that's probably 2027. I do rate Fogarty game would be a handy stop gap
Well he apparently got homesick when he was last here, but maybe he just didn't get on with BA.
If we desperately need a stop gap for a year because our next big thang is still not ready for FG then it's an option.
Rather try 7 Moses, 6 Lomax, 2 JAC, 3 Simonsson, 4 Penisini, 5 someone half decent.
Fog would be a good patch job for a season. But id hate to think that Ryles didn't already have a better target in mind . It's a shame that Brown didn't fuck off earler and we could've landed Brooks for the short term.
Yeah brown has messed up Blaize and sanders chance of staying at the club just to leave. That's the worst part of it. Selfish move on that part
Well no, it is not selfish. Brown is not looking out for Parramatta he is looking out for his best interest. He is not going to say "I'll go now so you can bring through Talagi".
Well , it was kinda selfish requesting the out clauses in the first place. However he's not Robinson Crusoe being a selfish NRL player. Unfortunately it's a generational thing , as well as a cultural thing. At some point in time peoples ethics can take a big turn. Wheras some players would stop and think , " this clubs been good to me , I've just managed to get a lucrative contract and great security with the term, I haven't set the world on fire and they've paid me well until now , I'm now happy to sign and both parties are content they got a good deal " then you have a different personality ( and this is where Brown put himself on my shit list officially) who say " I've got everything I want , however let's push for more and say , thanks for your offer , but I also want a get out clause as I actually don't want to commit anything at all on my end whatsoever " .
It's just pure selfishness and entitlement beyond what I'd regard as fair and reasonable negotiating.as someone who negotiates daily in a boardroom environment, it's the kind of stage of the process where it becomes rude and one sided. I can honestly say it'd be a dealbreaker for me and I said so the minute we heard about the clauses. Was a huge red flag for me .
Fogarty was here for half a season then got homesick for the coast then ended up in Canberra lol
I'd take him for a season orv2 if there is a bigger plan
You must be kidding. No way Ryles would allow that to happen.
Let's not even entertain that option.
I'm not moving the best halfback we have had since Sterlo to accommodate Fogarty at 7.
That's just plain ridiculous.