Replies

  • The two brothers would be gold . Build a club around them

     

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Not a chance. Teddy is still comfortably better.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • Turbo fits into the centres nicely, why would you move or drop Tedesco when they can both play perfectly now in the Same team. 

  • Don’t know how many times I’ve said it the Trbojevic brothers we should be clearing the decks to obtain. We get quality footballers to build a club around and the perfect leader in Jake

    • They're not leaving Manly, not for any amount of money we could prudently offer them. Come back to planet Earth.

      • 100% correct. They're Manly boys through and through and I'm sure they'll still be at the northern beaches team when they retire.

      • What a load of crap , nobody’s more Manly then Bob Fulton. Roosters anyone.

        • Different era, pre salary cap. Apples and oranges 

          • Cronk left the Storm, Tedesco the Tigers , Klemmer the dogs ,RTS the Roosters,Inglis the storm plenty more Brett who came up through junior systems who plenty thought wouldn’t leave their clubs. Money talks bullshit walks.

            • Cronk left Melbourne to be with his missus in Sydney.

              Tedesco left the Tigers because they are a basket case.

              Klemmer left the Dogs because Newcastle offered him a fortune, and the Dogs are crap.

              RTS left the Roosters because he wanted to go home to NZ.

              Inglis was forced to leave Melbourne because of the salary cap rort.

              The Trbojevic brothers are Manly juniors, they only want to play for Manly, they are happy there, Manly will pay them more than enough to keep them there.

              There is no amount of money we could prudently offer to induce them to leave Manly. We would have to offer them at least $1.5m each per year to even get their attention. 

              It just ain’t happening, not in a million years.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Clintorian replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Not to mention all the other teams in Rugby he could be playing in."
2 hours ago
Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"It's now out of the NRL's hands. If the court says the conditions of the release are valid and still stand then that is that. The NRL can't stomp all over the Eels' legal rights.  Lomax told the Eels in writing he was proceeding with the Storm…"
4 hours ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"You'd think it's in the NRL's best interest to be on Parra's side here. If they take the side of Lomax then every player contract means nothing. This is bigger than a single case- it could open up a world where players do whatever they want,…"
4 hours ago
Eelovution replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"When the announcement was made by the Eels regarding the dispute with Lomax, the club made a very important note in their commentary- the agreement was made in 'Good Faith'. This is a very important principle in legal agreements- both parties agree…"
6 hours ago
More…