The woman at the centre of the rape allegations surrounding Parramatta Eels star Jarryd Hayne has spoken our, telling Fairfax she was "saving herself for marriage" before the alleged incident with Hayne.
Hayne is alleged to have engaged with non-consensual sexual intercourse with the woman in his San Jose apartment, with the woman known as 'Ms V' admitting the pair were intoxicated.
After Hayne's criminal case was tossed out by the DA in 2015 because there wasn't enough evidence to sustain continuing, but the Eels player now faces a Civil case in California when the matter resurfaced a week out from Christmas.

Hayne has "vehemently" denied all allegations, and hasn't spoken to media about the case after leaving Australia for Israel where he's on a scheduled religious pilgrimage.

But the woman's lawyer, in an interview with Fairfax, said that she was a Christian herself and was saving herself for marriage.
"The fact is that this woman, because of her religious and moral beliefs, saved herself [for marriage] into her mid-20s and had the decision taken from her," lawyer Micha Star Liberty said.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Being so intoxicated that you were not able to make the right decision ....Was the wrong decision...THE END
  • Should have learned to keep her legs shut well.
  • Haha cash grab at its best. Hayne should claim she took advantage of him. 

  • All I'm going to say about this to any women out there, if you go back to someone's place late at night, drunk or not, the man is not expecting an all night talk. This woman must be very naïve and is using the virgin angle for sympathy. The fact that she thought about it for several months before she reported it is also a worry. Sorry but you can't have regrets after the fact and then decide its rape.

    This sounds a bit like the Assange farce. Two women had unprotected sex with him, apparently consensual, spoke to their friends for several months and then decided it was rape.

    • So how about you make a comment now to men advising against taking drunk & passed out woman home. Are they entitled to a feck? Just wondering wether or not your advice applied to guys as well? Would it be same advice if it was a guy making the complaint that he had been anally raped?

      How about giving some advice on respectful behaviour?

  • LOLLL!!!!!

    Its christian v christian.

  • Buyers remorse. 

    We’ve all made bad decisions drunk. Doesn’t mean we sued people. 

  • From what the media have reported . This world and that county are all f**ked up. She was no paralatic and uncommunicative , she had prenscence of mind to take his underwear but not go to hospital or police for a number of months . Using the “virgin Christian angle” what virgin and so called Christian , drinks and goes alone to a mans house . Sorry if she wants to use morals In her claim , her actions can also be judged .

    I’m so glad that I don’t have to grow up in the farked up world
    • Every whore claims to be a innocent virgin when it suits them . 

      This girl says she woke in a pool of blood yet decided it would be better to grab a clean pair of Jarryd's underwear just in case she needed it , if you really got raped surely you would green the sheets with the blood that would of also contained Jarryd's dna .

      Why would anyone rape a woman then  leave them in their apartment ? Surely you would try to get rid of the girl and as much evidence that you actually even had sex with her .

      Where is the proof that this girl  was as intoxicated as she claims ? Her friend saying that she was intoxicated is not proof and if this girl was the sweet innocent virgin girl then why would this so called friend let her take off with s stranger ?   Poor Jarryd has to go through this bullshit all because some whore wants some cash . 

  • Yep us Catholics are the worst drinkers ...

    as for virgins yep there still are some floating around this century . I even knew two girls who saved themselves born in 1973 so they do exist if they feel strongly enough about it being important ( stupid but true lol)

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Alfred replied to Blue Eel's discussion Trial #2, Game Day Blog v Roosters
"Looks promising 
Need spots for Guymer and Samrani. It's tough 
 "
35 seconds ago
Poppa replied to Blue Eel's discussion Trial #2, Game Day Blog v Roosters
"You know Bluey that was a great hitout for some of those "babes" most of them would never have played in a game with that much speed in it....It was an invaluable lesson playing against a team like the Roosters, being rattled for a while and then…"
2 minutes ago
HH - Love You Iongi Time! replied to Blue Eel's discussion Trial #2, Game Day Blog v Roosters
"Booked in to get my Sean Russell tattoo tomorrow, Prof. Daz 😇"
4 minutes ago
LB replied to Blue Eel's discussion Trial #2, Game Day Blog v Roosters
"You asked who is worse, I gave you options. But that 2nd half was he the worst on field for us yes or no?
Plus Kautoga there by default of nobody else yet made great offloads and good line-break.
Not saying every players is amazing, but come on mate…"
4 minutes ago
More…