How about a new rule change

Hey guys, its been a while since I posted anything, but after watching the game last night, I thought it was time that I did. I have been thinking for a while that how the game could be improved if a knock on was only a knock on if the ball actually hit the turf. My way of thinking is it would speed up the game if we didn't have all these replays to see if a player knocked  the ball into an opposing player or not. As long as the ball doesn't touch the ground who cares if it hits another player or not. 

I am sure someone will educate me on the error  of my thoughts of a rule change and I will be happy to be proven wrong, so the ball is in your court, fire away.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • It would be better if they just enforced the rule correctly.
    It appears any dropped ball becomes a knock on these days. So many balls are knocked backwards but are called back as knock ons
  • Very true Brett, it amazes me the lack of ball security sometimes at the highest level, and agree when 2 players are competing for the ball as long as it doesn't hit the ground play on

  • This reply was deleted.
    • No, there is a rule for that currently, and it is not a knock on if you regather the ball yourself if it doesn't touch anything.
  • This reply was deleted.
    • Cameron Smith probably ruled that Billy's one was ok though and called play on.

  • It's a rule that has become way too technical and common sense has fallen away.

    I agree with the sentiment when players are competing - stupid to be calling a knock on because it might have skimmed one players fingernail then on to a thread on the sleeve of another player while they are both jumping for it in the air! The other one that infuriates me is a player making a tackle, not playing at the ball, and they happen to dislodge the attacking players loose carry being called for a knock on - Jenko had one on Thur night - that's another stupid interpretation of the rule.

    Eliminate the grey and the confusing. It's a simple game - keep the rules simple.

    • I agree with your second comment. Nothing more frustrating than when a player goes to pass and it happens to make contact with a defenders shoulder or arm when making the tackle. And they get another full set. Why should the defending team be penalised for an attacking player trying to rush a pass. In any other situation it's ruled as not played at if the ball is kicked into a player.
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

EA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Your best 19 vs Storm
"Jim and Coinakis will be in Jersey Flegg."
3 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Your best 19 vs Storm
"Remember though, when they signed Da Silva, Smith had played 15 or so games. Only another 7 odd after. Smith played I believe the same to finish as he did later.
Ryles wanted a second Hooker and Anasta said when we were looking at Starling and…"
15 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Who Said Trials Mean Nothing?
"As a fan I don't look at the score it gives me a chance to hone in on certain things much like last year all I looked at was the middle of the ruck purely because for me as a fan I wanted to see a game we can take to Melbourne and win with.
Pre…"
39 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Your best 19 vs Storm
"JDB starts every game at 13 imo I like what he does round the middle of the ruck and brings physicality to our middle.Saw it in the roosters trial his wrestle second man in murders a play the ball it's so slow it's great for us.
Walker I'm not…"
47 minutes ago
More…