I think the more Hayne touch's the ball, the more we are dangerous.
He is far the greatest ball player in our team and has 3D vision, and yet we sit back and complain we have no halves to get us going.
His role at fullback is also unusual. He doesnt support or run onto any offloads and his defensive positional play comes under attack. And he usually plays a no.6 role when things do happen.
So really we are wasting the fullback and no.6 position by relying on Hayne to do both.
At the same time if we are gonna field Burt next year, he has got to play full-back plz. He was on fire the last time he was there and he is safe as in defence. I dont see us gaining anything with Burt on the wing.
HAYNE AT NO.6 is the key believe me people. Take Carney as an example, he was great at fullback, but he is even better at no.6.. and Hayne will shiittt on him.
Replies
If we leave things the way we are minus mateo! we will get the spoon.
Carney has always been at half his whole career. he only went back to fullback for a few games as they were just settling him in at new club and hadnt played 1st grade in a long time..
Nor will Tahu play on the wing.
Lets move on....
To be perfectly honest I think the reason that Slater is always selected at fullback for Australia is because he plays the position better, Hayne has a tendency to drift a bit and he isn't always in the right position, that's why Burt should play at fullback, true he's not as big but IMO he plays the position better.
He gotta step up next year, take control. Be the playmaker and even our captain or co-captain.
All the dominant players in successful teams are in the halves position and most are captains e.g. scott prince (see how many touches he got last night). Hayne should be gettn more involved.
While he can play 1st and 2nd receiver he is much better off playing in positions where his first thought is to run.
Moving Hayne from fullback to any position is a giant step backwards.