Can someone explain to me how the gutherson try was any different from the warriors second try. Both lost possession but maintained contact with the arm.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Hope so. We need a nasty c*nt amongst our ranks. Too many good boys.
Big in NAS to put the fear of god in the opposition. Will make them thing twice about running hard in his general direction."
Big in NAS to put the fear of god in the opposition. Will make them thing twice about running hard in his general direction."
"I just hope that we train R Smith into a B Smith type player. Someone that can play in the middle. Not a fan off carrying two players that can only play hooker in the same 17 regardless of how good they are. Need one of them to be able to play…"
"Let's give him a full season first. He just turned 20 and didn't have a pre-season with us. Let's give him 2026 then comment."
Replies
Agree actually Gutho didn’t swap arms unlike warriors he just seemed to eventually get it down imo
warriors try had much more loss of control:-(
This shitty rookie ref who Ive never seen before. Its all his fault.
Yeah yeah, I blame him anyway, everytime something goes wrong it's his stupid face I'm seeing ;)
Beau Scott is Video ref.
I have no,problem with those decisions.
What about the knock on to the lead up to the 2nd try and what about when Moses smashed winger he went out and knocked on yet play on! Do you even go for the eels!? This game may define our chance of finals and there is so much going against us in our home game not like it's in New Zealand
So much against us? Like a 9-2 penalty count, Gutho’s 3 on 1 strip, RTS’s not forward pass for match winning try being pulled up.
It was definitely foward! Both touch judge and ref called it forward!
I'm with monto. It was a great bit of play but I think it was forward.
Gutho didn't ground the ball. That's the difference.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next