Replies

      • Yep guess so. Such a 'wholesome' cover and gorgeous young family...so bloody greedy. 

  • Just WOW!

  •  Didn't see that one coming and the last person I would expect to be involved in anything like this. *sigh

  • The old " make an easy earn " .  Now when you google Michael Gordon it won't be 300 game nrl player with exceptional talent and ability that thrilled fans it will be drug syndicate member ex nrl player ..... 

    Supply and demand . If the demand wasn't so high for this shit ... particularly in that area . Met him a few times and he was a genuinely nice family bloke .   

    another bad life decision .  He will have his day in court but not a good look. 

  • Unbelievable

    • Money and easy at that can corrupt anyone.

  • Very surprised to read this. Drug use is an issue all over Australia but may be more prevalent on the Gold Coast.

    • LOL - Gordon's mistake was going into business in opposition to the local police imo.

      Common saying on the Glitter Strip - If you want to get drugs, ask a cop.

      • This reply was deleted.
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"It's now out of the NRL's hands. If the court says the conditions of the release are valid and still stand then that is that. The NRL can't stomp all over the Eels' legal rights.  Lomax told the Eels in writing he was proceeding with the Storm…"
2 hours ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"You'd think it's in the NRL's best interest to be on Parra's side here. If they take the side of Lomax then every player contract means nothing. This is bigger than a single case- it could open up a world where players do whatever they want,…"
2 hours ago
Eelovution replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"When the announcement was made by the Eels regarding the dispute with Lomax, the club made a very important note in their commentary- the agreement was made in 'Good Faith'. This is a very important principle in legal agreements- both parties agree…"
3 hours ago
RB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Yeah, but does that count if the opportunity never eventuated, is what I think they'll argue"
4 hours ago
More…