Everyone calling for Brads sacking

Why?

I ask you this, what exactly do you think is going to happen if we offload BA and bring in someone new?

I will tell you, we get a new coach, we have majority of the same players for a couple of years, we are "rebuilding" AGAIN! ..... 5 years away nothing has changed and you are back calling for the coaches head again!

Something needs to change, I agree, but I don't blame Brad. You can call me a unicorn or whatever predictable bullshit insult anyone throws around on here, but the fact remains he is not the one dropping balls and giving away penalties.... yeah, he keeps picking the same players every week, but who do you put in from our top 30? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • You don't lose the ability to coach in 12 months..

    The players are playing like busteds.

    Attack is woeful

    • Yes you do, when it turns out Peter Gentle was the one getting the best out of the team, he leaves, brads exposed and has nothing.

  • Someone new might make the easy decisions BA wont make like dropping norman, blooding some fresh players and putting the blame on the players if they turn up and play shit... not just saying "they tried hard"
  • You are the reason this club hasn't won shit for over 30 Years 

    • Hard to argue with that.

    • Lol harsh but could be right
    • well sometimes I feel like that, was born in 1987 so they will probably come good the year after I kick the bucket

      • I was born in 79

        The first football memory i have is the 86 gf so......

  • At 2 and 10 you blood the next generation. Especially when those in question are as old AF. The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over (picking the same players) and expecting a different result (winning).
  • lol

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Muttman replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Hopefully the subpoaened evidence we now have will prevent any retribution from the NRL. We all know they wanted Zac in Melbourne."
52 seconds ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Eels played this superbly. They won. Hands down. Melbourne don't get their player, Lomax doesn't return to the NRL and the Storm have to pay the majority of our legal costs."
3 minutes ago
Muttman’s discussion was featured
Summary:Zac Lomax has settled his legal dispute with the Parramatta Eels, agreeing he cannot return to the NRL without the club’s written consent before the 2028 season.In a surprise development in the NSW Supreme Court, both parties reached a…
5 minutes ago
Richard B'Stard replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"I hope the total legal fees weren't a cent over $250k..."
6 minutes ago
More…