Everyone calling for Brads sacking

Why?

I ask you this, what exactly do you think is going to happen if we offload BA and bring in someone new?

I will tell you, we get a new coach, we have majority of the same players for a couple of years, we are "rebuilding" AGAIN! ..... 5 years away nothing has changed and you are back calling for the coaches head again!

Something needs to change, I agree, but I don't blame Brad. You can call me a unicorn or whatever predictable bullshit insult anyone throws around on here, but the fact remains he is not the one dropping balls and giving away penalties.... yeah, he keeps picking the same players every week, but who do you put in from our top 30? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • You don't lose the ability to coach in 12 months..

    The players are playing like busteds.

    Attack is woeful

    • Yes you do, when it turns out Peter Gentle was the one getting the best out of the team, he leaves, brads exposed and has nothing.

  • Someone new might make the easy decisions BA wont make like dropping norman, blooding some fresh players and putting the blame on the players if they turn up and play shit... not just saying "they tried hard"
  • You are the reason this club hasn't won shit for over 30 Years 

    • Hard to argue with that.

    • Lol harsh but could be right
    • well sometimes I feel like that, was born in 1987 so they will probably come good the year after I kick the bucket

      • I was born in 79

        The first football memory i have is the 86 gf so......

  • At 2 and 10 you blood the next generation. Especially when those in question are as old AF. The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over (picking the same players) and expecting a different result (winning).
  • lol

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"LB, Eli, good stuff gents. We've acted in good-faith. By the book. With clean hands. Lomax appears not to. Still, equity is not unlikely to view an NRL-wide 3-year restraint until 31Oct 28' as overly-punitive and read it down.
We'd still win,…"
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"The best thing for the Eels is if we say nothing our position is clear we only have to come back to the table if Melbourne come with something we see as advantageous for us that really is the bottom line.
Best thing about this there the ones doing…"
2 hours ago
Eli Stephens replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"If you look at it from a player for player deal, would you rather Lomax or Howarth if you are the Storm but ? I just don't see any way legally the storm can force the eels to hand them Lomax 🤣 either way don't really care what storm end up doing but…"
7 hours ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"I know i have said it before but Storm fans say we are being unreasonable and see no outcome in which we win this case. Despite all the released, that is still the belief. I believe in bias and backing your team but come on.
But i do not think they…"
8 hours ago
More…