Eels win in the Supreme Court

Summary:

Zac Lomax has settled his legal dispute with the Parramatta Eels, agreeing he cannot return to the NRL without the club’s written consent before the 2028 season.

In a surprise development in the NSW Supreme Court, both parties reached a settlement that largely upholds the original terms of his release. Lomax will now be free to return to the NRL without Parramatta’s consent in 2028 instead of 2029 — but until then, he remains restricted.

This means he cannot join the Melbourne Storm unless the Eels provide written approval.

As part of the agreement, Melbourne must pay $250,000 towards Parramatta’s legal costs.

The dispute arose after Lomax was released from his $700,000-per-year contract to pursue an opportunity in the failed R360 rugby union competition. Parramatta included a clause preventing him from signing with another NRL club until November 2028 without their consent. Negotiations between Melbourne and Parramatta broke down over transfer fees and player swap proposals before the matter was resolved in court.
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/zac-lomax-once-again-in-contract-limbo-after-settling-with-parramatta/news-story/28e01750be0a26c3e610008358d71d71

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 1
Email me when people reply –

Replies

        • They've got a 7 in Woods much like us waiting for a 6 until then I do wonder where we are at though as they swung hard to get Galvin.Where do they see a player like Burton in respect to Talataina going foward.Burton definitely fits the Moses timeline so it'll be interesting times.For me Burton already has a premiership so I wouldn't be surprised if he went to Perth on mega bucks as at his point in his career I don't think discounts will be given to any team.

          • Yes I would suspect Perth would chase him with decent money but he does have a very young family so he might take less to stay in Sydney 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

EeLmatiC replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"I get that, but we know that Melbourne was offering to pay legal costs with the view to obtain Lomax's services. Settling without going through the full legal process tells me that they were aware that they would not obtain his services, so…"
44 seconds ago
Angry Eel replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Yes I would suspect Perth would chase him with decent money but he does have a very young family so he might take less to stay in Sydney "
3 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to Blue Eel's discussion The last of the BA Era.
"I'm waiting for him to say he is going to play on for another couple of years, as the medical retirement angle hasn't been accessed to date by him or the club. You can't medically retire if you want another contract. Did somebody say Papua New…"
15 minutes ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"chief it was agreed by the clubs "
43 minutes ago
More…