Eels win in the Supreme Court

Summary:

Zac Lomax has settled his legal dispute with the Parramatta Eels, agreeing he cannot return to the NRL without the club’s written consent before the 2028 season.

In a surprise development in the NSW Supreme Court, both parties reached a settlement that largely upholds the original terms of his release. Lomax will now be free to return to the NRL without Parramatta’s consent in 2028 instead of 2029 — but until then, he remains restricted.

This means he cannot join the Melbourne Storm unless the Eels provide written approval.

As part of the agreement, Melbourne must pay $250,000 towards Parramatta’s legal costs.

The dispute arose after Lomax was released from his $700,000-per-year contract to pursue an opportunity in the failed R360 rugby union competition. Parramatta included a clause preventing him from signing with another NRL club until November 2028 without their consent. Negotiations between Melbourne and Parramatta broke down over transfer fees and player swap proposals before the matter was resolved in court.
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/zac-lomax-once-again-in-contract-limbo-after-settling-with-parramatta/news-story/28e01750be0a26c3e610008358d71d71

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 1
Email me when people reply –

Replies

      • I have a feeling the NRL will be pretty nice to us for a while given we obviously have a few smoking guns they obviously don't want public.

      • Why when parra have info to make Vlandys lose his job and reputation and can put the game 10 years back.

  • He's not banned he's free to talk with other clubs under the auspice it's a swap deal that'll make it happen.

    This is a recruitment opportunity for us if we can use it correctly we should be encouraging his return to the game name because it's advantageous for us to do so.

    We need outside backs we need some more class explosive athletes let's go get one.

    • Yep great point, it is just the deal we made with Lomax stands. Nobody, not even NRL can bully us into something we don't want til his deal is done.

      • Exactly, Mutts article actually says that Lomax cannot join Melbourne unless Parra give written consent.  

  • 31095122469?profile=RESIZE_930x

    31095121477?profile=RESIZE_400x

    • Never noticed how big his nose is. Kid used to have a nose as cute as a button, now it looks like a bloody Toucan.

      Probably grew from all the lies he told Parramatta.

    • Don't splash the pot

  • Daily Telegraph are reporting that Melbourne agreed to take on Matterson to get Lomax but Matterson refused to move to Melbourne.

    https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/zac-lomax-back-in-limbo...

     

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Kenny Power replied to Comedian's discussion Great we won the battle but not the war
"Seriously where do people get these thoughts from. There would be criminal charges if they did such things .. with all the betting done on the game they would be goners "
2 minutes ago
Rabz S replied to Comedian's discussion Great we won the battle but not the war
"We have enough dirt on the NRL that they would be stupid to retaliate against us now."
12 minutes ago
The Badger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 1 Team List v Melbourne Storm
"Debuted as winger last season. Not sure if he played more than off the bench though before moving to FB and 5/8."
13 minutes ago
Pato replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"NRL360 suggested earlier that Melbourne offered Matterson two years with 2nd year as a club option but Matterson rejected and wanted 2 years guaranteed "
24 minutes ago
More…