Eels win in the Supreme Court

Summary:

Zac Lomax has settled his legal dispute with the Parramatta Eels, agreeing he cannot return to the NRL without the club’s written consent before the 2028 season.

In a surprise development in the NSW Supreme Court, both parties reached a settlement that largely upholds the original terms of his release. Lomax will now be free to return to the NRL without Parramatta’s consent in 2028 instead of 2029 — but until then, he remains restricted.

This means he cannot join the Melbourne Storm unless the Eels provide written approval.

As part of the agreement, Melbourne must pay $250,000 towards Parramatta’s legal costs.

The dispute arose after Lomax was released from his $700,000-per-year contract to pursue an opportunity in the failed R360 rugby union competition. Parramatta included a clause preventing him from signing with another NRL club until November 2028 without their consent. Negotiations between Melbourne and Parramatta broke down over transfer fees and player swap proposals before the matter was resolved in court.
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/zac-lomax-once-again-in-contract-limbo-after-settling-with-parramatta/news-story/28e01750be0a26c3e610008358d71d71

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 1
Email me when people reply –

Replies

      • As I read it, the storm are paying $250 toward our legal costs but in addition they will have to look after their own, so it's $250k +

        Hope they engaged their legal team on a: "no win, no fee" basis!!   hahaha

  • I hope the total legal fees weren't a cent over $250k...

  • Eels played this superbly. They won. Hands down. Melbourne don't get their player, Lomax doesn't return to the NRL and the Storm have to pay the majority of our legal costs.

    • Hopefully the subpoaened evidence we now have will prevent any retribution from the NRL. We all know they wanted Zac in Melbourne.

      • There must be something big and juicy in there for this to be the outcome.

        • It is the ONLY explanation.

        • 100%. Settled and paid Parramatta because of this. But I still think a swap deal is being worked out, they just couldnt get the whole deal done in time. Both the Storm and NRL did not want this to play out in court, it will go back to behind closed doors.

        • Parra have enough information that could possibly put the NRL and storms exposed which this could possibly or potentially start a war and a super league like comp being form.

  • This is basically a FU to VLandy's & Abdo for their support to the Storm. I've no doubt the NRL had a hand in this settlement and wouldn't be surprised if they pay the $250k.
    Handing over records showing they favoured one club over another wouldn't have been a good look for the administartors of the game.

    Let's see how they handle the narrative moving forward.

    • This makes me very happy.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Prof. Daz replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Does the $250,000 come off Storm's cap? The salary cap includes inducements to play, like houses or cars or legal fees. What is the chance V'Landys, already with egg on his face for supporting the Storm's case that has been shown to have no legs by…"
3 minutes ago
Strange-eel replied to Blue Eel's discussion The last of the BA Era.
"It's interesting thinking about it."
8 minutes ago
Richard Jackson replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Thats given mate. just so long as they're not as harsh as the were to the Dragons in Vegas! Expect increased decibles from the cooking pots though."
8 minutes ago
parra supporter replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Read storm offered to pay him 400K for him to be essentially released and he still said no. Bellamy didn't want him there"
27 minutes ago
More…