Eels want quick hearing, NRL needs more time
The Parramatta officials had wanted a hearing held quickly on their threatened deregistration so the team's ability to play for points would not be jeopardised.
At a further hearing on Friday Eels barrister Arthur Moses SC said he wanted the matter finalised next week, but the NRL's barrister Lachlan Gyles SC said he needed more time.
"They brought this on ... If they want to start it, they should finish it rather than this dragging on," Moses said.
Gyles said the temporary injunction imposed by the court on Tuesday is not needed and is confusing.
The injunction has been extended until Monday and a date for a hearing challenging the proposed NRL deregistration of Eels' officials is expected to be set next week.
Gyles added he was happy for the Eels to have their day in court but needed more time to prepare the NRL's case.
"The NRL case involves some complexity," Gyles said.
"This case is in a way a sideshow ... this is not the main game your honour."
The Eels' next match is on May 13 against South Sydney.
=======
By all reports our barrister had the NRL on the ropes the whole way.
Replies
It was shortly after this that the NRL made their media statement pointing out that everything said on Tuesday was only preliminary and they reserved the right to change the penalty.
So if I think I am innocent of something I am accused on I should just take the punishment?
What is the bet that a deal is brokered over the week which significantly reduces the penalty and we drop the legal action?
This court case has nothing to do with the penalty regarding points and fine.
"How long will the jury be out Jacky?
"Don't worry sweet-cheeks, they won't be back for days."
Damm!!!!
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 6 Next