Replies

          • Yes Mutts, spot on!


            “Back in November 2025, we granted Zac Lomax’s request for a release to pursue opportunities outside the NRL on the condition that he would not return to the NRL during the period of his original playing contract with our Club, without our written consent.”

            ”Zac had legal representation during the negotiations of his release. Zac accepted those conditions on the basis that he told us that his interests were focused on pursuing opportunities with rugby union, particularly R360. The release documentation was registered with the NRL. The NRL are aware of the conditions associated with the release.

        • I have been saying that we are fighting Lomax AND NRL. I am proud of us for fighting. Now we have to fight on both fronts. We can do it but we will have to hold our nerve. Allies will appear

  • Watch for zac's team to play the mental health card next

    • Playbook 101 from this point. 

      • You know Bluey I always smelled a rat in him leaving us, the fact that he started planning it in July confirms something must have happened.......I have been bitterly disappointed in us losing him from the time it was confirmed.....cancelling his Kangeroo Trip made no sense either.....mental health maybe a problem but stupidity doesn't qualify him!

        Seriously what club would be wanting to take him at this point?

    • He can't legally claim mental health when he never stated mental health release. Parra has the power from here. 

  • The nrl should pay our legal costs .lomax and storm are making a joke out of nrl system yet eels have to pay .how is an agent allowed to do this type of deal.

    Did eels lodge lomax break contract with nrl 

    Then again we could have said  no u must stay an eel

    Rosters built on court cases 🤮

  • This is the strong stance we've all been hoping for from the club. Parra by putting this out in public like they have calling out the Storm like they have is gingtonbe huge. The NRL has no leg to stand on, RPLA is nowhere to be found and for once Parra holds all the cards. 

  • Nice. But the NRL should be backing us. We have called V'landys bluff now as this drags on, lets bring him to heel by making his impotence and abandonment a talking point. I am proud of us for kicking this off in their faces

    • No one has said Vlandys is against us dopey.....if anything he would be right beside us, its not in his interests to see the contract system destroyed.

      Are you still on medication Randolph?

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Poppa replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels taking Lomax to court
"Please read and understand what Muttman has said hereunder Randy, the NRL are not our enemy in this process. Its very much in the NRL interests to be strongly in accordance with Parramatta......what don't you understand about that?"
46 seconds ago
Poppa replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels taking Lomax to court
"Are you OK Randy? "
7 minutes ago
TolEllts replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"I hope this is the start of something great for the club culture"
9 minutes ago
parra supporter replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels taking Lomax to court
"I think it would be a safe assumption that the nrl would be keen to have Lomax sign with storm. Particularly with us playing them in rd 1. Drama sells tickets."
11 minutes ago
More…