Eels statement on salary cap

The Parramatta Eels have today received a preliminary breach notice from the National Rugby League (NRL) regarding the Eels' NRL and NYC salary caps. The NRL has recommended an overall fine of $525,000.As the NRL acknowledged, the primary contributing factor was consistent mismanagement of the NRL and NYC playing squad and salary cap compliance between 2010 and mid-2013.In 2013, the newly-elected board of the Parramatta Leagues Club initiated an extensive internal investigation, which by late 2013, had raised significant concerns regarding player contracts and squad management.Eels senior management alerted the NRL of its concerns, and it was determined that the club would continue to advise the NRL of all subsequent issues to be considered as part of the NRL’s regular 2014 mid-season salary cap audit.Eels CEO Scott Seward said the club had cooperated extensively with the NRL in its audit processes.“We have been upfront with the NRL, in fact, we were the first to bring these issues to the NRL’s attention,” Seward said.“The situation as it stands is that with the hard work of our football department and the support of the Board we are compliant with the salary cap for the 2015 season, and in good shape for the seasons to come.”“For us, that’s paramount. We are determined to continue strengthening the Eels line up to maximise our opportunities to succeed.”Eels Chairman Steve Sharp described today’s announcement as symptomatic of wider failures in the previous administrations of the club. “Today’s findings again highlight that dark period for our club between 2010 and 2013,” Sharp said.“The constant changing of coaches, players and club executives, the mismanagement of core parts of our business across both the Eels and Parramatta Leagues Club, and these issues go hand in hand.”“As part of our commitment to good governance and in order to rectify the bad practices of the past, a full review of all player contracts was done and any and all non-compliant aspects across both NRL and NYC were included in the 2014 NRL salary cap audit.”The NRL has also recommended a conditional penalty of 4 competition points, to be deducted at the start of the 2016 season unless the Eels undertake an independent review of governance and organisational capability and implement all reasonable changes recommended by that review. The Eels Board will review the NRL recommendations and then provide a response in relation to the preliminary breach notice and the proposed independent review.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Larissa at the start of the season - "I can answer all your enquires"
    Larissa today - "shit, what a mess, I'm out of here"

    lol
  • People need to grow a thick skin and calm the f@#k down and grow a pair while your at it.
    THIS IS PARRAMATTA.
  • This reply was deleted.
    • Hes stating the facts Mack, and it seems like theres a lot of stupid supporters who dont understand the dynamics, once again the current board is getting hammered by dopes for something they didnt create, why should he sit back and cop the blame, hes on the front foot just as you or i would be.

    • It's not petty at all. Holy crap Mack the place was a disaster that Sharp and co inherited. How many OLGR investigations and now salary cap breaches do you need to see before you'll understand how deep a hole this club had dug itself?

    • Mack this not a blame game, this is a fact! Under the watch of the 2010-2013 administration salary cap breeches are now costing the club 525000.00!!!! This is national news!!!! And you want Steve sharp to put his hand up and say what??? It's his fault?

      Because of a previous admistration we now get deducted 4 competition points at the beginning of 2016!!! Nothing like deducing points off your season to put a spring in the step of the 2016 squad!

      We finally start getting a squad together that could go on to do some amazing things next year and then this.

      Are the eels cursed ? Stuff it!!! I still love them though!!
  • I get that it's a 'primarily' inherited from past administrations but what of the apparent 2014 breaches and repeatedly ignoring warnings from the NRL?
    • x2

    • The problem is that if they didn't play these players last year we wouldn't have had a team to play.
      They were left paying 750 grand for 12 players who weren't at the club.
    • If I was Sharp there'd be no way I'd be taking the fall for other's mismanagement.
  • The players that were let go at THE END OF 2013 were done so with Sharp's blessing. The decision to play players in 2014 when the NRL said not to were done so with Brad Arthur and Sharp in charge.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Flow Basket replied to Desieels's discussion One game only, same old story. 40 years of this rubbish (spoiler alert REALLY REALLY LONG POST)
"I will raise u .
The ref's 
Russell gone . "
26 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 6 moreeee
"Agreed, prefer just a full blown whistle and explanation as to why it's called. Not just the official saying 6 more and no one knowing what's going on. "
27 minutes ago
Francis Nelson replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 6 moreeee
"The six again rule should just be taken out of the game, It has been controversial, frustrating and  has not improved the game at all. No one in the viewing audience has no idea whats going on
 "
38 minutes ago
shane replied to EA's discussion Your Line up for next week?
"1 Iongi
2 Simmo
3 Pensini
4 Russell
5 Kelly
6 Papalii
7 Moses
8 Moretti
9 Smith
10 Paulo
11 Williams
12 Kautoga
13 Walker
14 Tuivita
15 Guymer
16 Tuilagi
17 Samrani
18 De Belin
19 Da Silva"
40 minutes ago
More…